On 2022-05-06, raingloom@riseup.net wrote:
> On Fri, 06 May 2022 00:50:21 +0200
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> The log goes like this:
>> ...
>> + guix shell --export-manifest gsl openblas gcc-toolchain --tune
>
> This seems to be the important part, it looks like the CPU arch isn't
> being detected.
>
>> Backtrace:
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>   1752:10 13 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
>> In unknown file:
>>           12 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 5bd2e0>)
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>     724:2 11 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure
>> default-prompt-handle…>) In ice-9/eval.scm:
>>     619:8 10 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 5c2c80>)))
>> In guix/ui.scm:
>>    2230:7  9 (run-guix . _)
>>   2193:10  8 (run-guix-command _ . _)
>> In guix/scripts/shell.scm:
>>    160:17  7 (guix-shell . _)
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>>   1747:15  6 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 4bd7b0 at ice-9/bo…>
>> …) In srfi/srfi-37.scm:
>>    201:16  5 (next-arg)
>>    113:18  4 (invoke-option-processor _ _ _ _ _)
>> In unknown file:
>>            3 (_ #<procedure 4bd660 at srfi/srfi-37.scm:114:22 ()> # #)
>>            2 (_ #<procedure 9aa9c0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:798:28 ()> # #)
>> In guix/transformations.scm:
>>    864:25  1 (_ _ _ _ ((package ad-hoc-package "gcc-toolchain") (…)
>> …)) In guix/cpu.scm:
>>      94:2  0 (cpu->gcc-architecture #f)
>
> This indicates the same to me.
> But I don't know the internals of --tune well enough, so it's just a
> hunch.
>
>> guix/cpu.scm:94:2: In procedure cpu->gcc-architecture:
>> In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1
>> (expecting struct): #f
>> + rm -r t-guix-manifest-12319
>> FAIL tests/guix-shell-export-manifest.sh (exit status: 1)
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I'm getting this same error too; happy to test any proposed patches.


live well,
  vagrant