From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: bug#24060: Test (tests/publish.scm) still fails after fix Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 00:59:49 -0700 Message-ID: <8737mrr1xm.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r3ajs7p2.fsf@gmail.com> <87twf94ug1.fsf@gmail.com> <87y44lv4sf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTPCk-0002GH-U5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 04:01:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTPCg-0004bO-Qx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 04:01:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTPCg-0004bF-Nt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 04:01:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bTPCg-0003K8-EK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 04:01:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r3ajs7p2.fsf@gmail.com> Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 24060@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Is this new failure systematic, or does it occur randomly? I've tried running the test over 100 times, and it failed every time. I've also tested it in a QEMU guest running GuixSD, and it still fails. I will see if I can reproduce it on a totally different physical computer and get back to you. > What version of Guile do you use? The version is "guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.11". This version comes from running "guix environment guix". I just now tried the same tests using guile-next (which is version 2.1.2), and they still failed. > I wonder if this could be a remnant of . > Does commenting out the =E2=80=9C/nar/gzip/*=E2=80=9D test hide the probl= em? Commenting out that test-equals section did not hide the problem. > If so, does the patch below help? I tried the patch anyway, and unfortunately the test still failed. =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXnF53AAoJEN1AmhXYIkadZHkQAJ1Asf7nCYA5FWc+16hOi2HS JDCe6rdrFqDSH9ylZOxqxb2cQNbDGIsTZw59ISJOK/4rvKechE2uhQ5Vcj8OYn58 q9nu83qKDr5CKdgZSsT9Ye5hA9DbCjGcboPC7UBrlCInbPFY1/aVuNwsT0WKcE5I QGexGTrm1ob+HZTnMCAQS2HDLvYSEuwHcAdw6cy7GxsOTv7y8XDLKtZcs4MwNPqo c0RMrX3b9gVnjvxSSxLClEZnfO8a5eUr7bn+x+tClcTzHPo1+OT9seDdcRFjGiNO 2TcxVglhwb0qVVKT5rK/pVQil2+si87Xe2eROTvE0sBXrwaBlcXZnXAIIY9tDiAv 3XlOVrc3FbvnLfsSUk8OdHLg5GMDUiwgiULD2FAJq6u9gO47dPTRAJA8AcBj9LjS 2LiR8kxB5tUUDBOx3fAApfScPaTsXJkJDYxLVGNpweUKQwp7aN/MPdDbUl6O6/AX UsXleQZlVk25yhPRuj3r5wAWBXlb8rD8FYGOoGUGVf+BBPrlg2dTnGATejMzae9J iJHeGgfdJXb8C91Tr1Dra21urx6NX7KSyIBU8xmPAMFFc1sGVZ63iduK/qf0IAyd 9Sj4dm48uI1pfEKZt8TeaCHNpdWc7om21pVrhTCqrKusT+sg58k3YAe4dMpxAKvq CC9FJdFBdtlv1pitwuEH =eBqS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--