From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#30434: magit =?UTF-8?Q?won=E2=80=99t?= work over TRAMP Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 04:09:38 -0500 Message-ID: <873721mhbh.fsf@netris.org> References: <87lgfyl67x.fsf@elephly.net> <87mv0e2jvm.fsf@gmail.com> <876072koq0.fsf@elephly.net> <87wozgosxx.fsf@netris.org> <871shny0a1.fsf@gmail.com> <877erfph9m.fsf@netris.org> <87po56avqn.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emc2s-0003SZ-FT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 04:11:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emc2o-0000kz-CI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 04:11:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emc2o-0000kp-8f for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 04:11:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emc2o-0005bw-1n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 04:11:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87po56avqn.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:38:56 +0300") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Alex Kost Cc: 30434@debbugs.gnu.org Alex Kost writes: > Mark H Weaver (2018-02-14 13:17 -0500) wrote: > >> Alex Kost writes: >> >>> You didn't remove "git" from the inputs. I think it is not needed now. >> >> I removed it on my first attempt, but the build failed. See below. > > Oh, right, sorry. I use my own package for magit and it dosn't require > git input, so I thought that the original guix package also doesn't need > it. Sorry for the confusion :-) How does your own magit package avoid requiring git as an input? I'd be curious to see the diff between your package definition and ours. Mark