From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#35941: Newt installer failure when wifi name is #f Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:19:45 +0200 Message-ID: <8736kywqr2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h89fj6p3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVdud-0008Az-SF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 11:21:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVduV-0007Jo-C5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 11:21:10 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hVduQ-0007HY-5y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 11:21:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hVduP-00037U-Vk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2019 11:21:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87h89fj6p3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Tue, 28 May 2019 10:59:04 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: Mathieu Othacehe , 35941@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Pierre, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > I've tried the installer today and it failed at the wifi selection, > printing a stack trace which allowed me to investigate. Since I could > not save it (shouldn't we dump it to a file by the way?), I've noted > down the following, roughly: > > In /gnu/installer/newt/wifi.scm: > 204: (run-wifi-page) > (filter ...:145 (service)... > (#< name: "foo" type: "wifi" path: "wifi_d..." ...) > 147: (_ #< (string-null? #f) > > > Apparently it fails because a wifi service name is #f. I believe this is the same bug as . Could you follow-up on the questions I asked there? That would allow us to understand exactly why you end up with an empty or #f service name. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.