From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@gmx.com>
Subject: bug#36614: rust@1.36's hash is incorrect.
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:41:59 +0100
Message-ID: <8736jby4go.fsf@gmx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47133)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hls51-0003RQ-DD
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:43:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hls50-0003Yg-9R
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:43:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58698)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hls50-0003YC-5e
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:43:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hls50-00075A-0N
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:43:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36614.B.156292453627169@debbugs.gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46953)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <pierre.langlois@gmx.com>) id 1hls4B-0003HG-Cf
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:42:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <pierre.langlois@gmx.com>) id 1hls4A-0002fj-AO
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:42:11 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:53559)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pierre.langlois@gmx.com>)
 id 1hls49-0002cK-Mq
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 05:42:10 -0400
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: 36614@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Ivan Petkov <ivanppetkov@gmail.com>

Hello Guix!

It looks like the hash for the new rust 1.36 is wrong, I get the following:

~~~
$ guix build rust
building /gnu/store/37wfhzp1yqm9w4vq0dhmy6bg3ajaa9yh-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.drv...

Starting download of /gnu/store/jm9xvf6qy4zxkb7rkmpz8ygf55l8v8v5-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz
>From https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz...
downloading from https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz...
 rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz  147.5MiB                                                            1.6MiB/s 01:35 [##################] 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/jm9xvf6qy4zxkb7rkmpz8ygf55l8v8v5-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz:
  expected hash: 18r688ih4xi9m8gv55g1amb8inrwkdxp5fbcqb6i4gqxi90l3i0m
  actual hash:   06xv2p6zq03lidr0yaf029ii8wnjjqa894nkmrm6s0rx47by9i04
hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/jm9xvf6qy4zxkb7rkmpz8ygf55l8v8v5-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz'
build of /gnu/store/37wfhzp1yqm9w4vq0dhmy6bg3ajaa9yh-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/37/wfhzp1yqm9w4vq0dhmy6bg3ajaa9yh-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.gz.drv.bz2'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/wzslkk72p8g9l5zymcb4hqfmq4zg29q7-rustc-1.36.0-src.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/61660f8p8xxdrhl267402yzq2d4c89ix-rust-1.36.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/61660f8p8xxdrhl267402yzq2d4c89ix-rust-1.36.0.drv' failed
~~~

Can you also reproduce this?

Hopefully it's not unstable :-/.

Thanks,
Pierre