From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id V+DUM8SFYWDcbgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:46:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id IDqWLcSFYWCfSAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:46:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409DE26C26 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:46:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQmbD-00078g-0r for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:46:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQmb4-00077C-T9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:46:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36179) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQmb4-0005iN-MJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQmb4-0004ZJ-It for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46212: ci.guix.gnu.org narinfos with excessive NarSize Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46212 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 46212-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46212.161700396117552 (code B ref 46212); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:46:02 +0000 Received: (at 46212) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2021 07:46:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47725 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQmb2-0004Z2-Kb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:46:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQmaz-0004Yo-Rv for 46212@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:45:59 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39307) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQmau-0005ai-12; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:45:52 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:f8a9:75d0:2054:75c6] (port=37866 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lQmat-0006mA-DK; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:45:51 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87zh0pf9ip.fsf@cbaines.net> <87r1lzftnx.fsf@cbaines.net> <874kh43725.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnu01rq6.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:45:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87wnu01rq6.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Sun, 21 Mar 2021 15:55:29 +0100") Message-ID: <8735we2yj5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46212@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1617003972; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=Avfmo/T9sjqij9IZ6uiaohafFeB4/3/UZj0XxAVpe4s=; b=spqoumIkegmevJP0T4G8lZIe4ZvYHXUDI7B3Wou4+t09tqkJxQa2hNLB/TNo/r1SM2wcet gZZ9lcNOMsbUZE133K39Hn3jF+liyC608nZ0zSm+73gQEvFgQcFaVrtFH2d686D3fwLrX8 Nid7LyoQhOCjyoib8eNYmOXNrPA4ACQZTvMloXZR4gDovr87Xe6OwLvyp5ZWp99GN4J2kC 3Wpsrs8eLR9dAvsobw1RXKml0pF8bIRvs6CQlhP87r0F7340hUsp4K7Z2UBAmKgYQkWK2F rqgysh8P8Oeclo4IYX0Tq7XmzflmLdw5Oec1v6zF5HRR6D4QmGhBnYKN6lA2MQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1617003972; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=faTngScV3dTN1NAmiE7VA+W4Stc6bCi38vbY/qZPq+sTY3CSUK5Gy+QJNy7Il7xbvLUDR9 BeeIDU7mVkND2ZwV5pUvGkjPEFVup9kfaIfruuQJ0mZ44tI51WRtepSAhhCsJsSQlYssdO xBPy/FPaOIxNlKUL31TkctgnGSrlXifsldPzOe5C5AEBZHrSFMhoW+dvLySXMA044fYwVV wzJvhHm6qOgoA8wHC2paSYwTGI3lmdK/UDsLYDY6jj2V3sM14tzr12LKRJevNLWayuzDwr v59ZGTLNO91nFC8gVfSJNZmYsqPWofxrx9u/o/bboYmLsrnk/EZc4Rc8Un+hng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.92 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 409DE26C26 X-Spam-Score: -2.92 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 9x6AXoIvf0lO Hey, > Could it be that the bug was fixed in the meantime? Or that this one > was, say, built directly via Guix whereas the other one was built > through Cuirass? Mystery! That's strange. There's nothing really special about how Cuirass builds its stuff. It's a plain "build-derivations" call in the "cuirass remote-worker" process. This process only builds stuff and report it using (simple-zmq). A memory corruption in that module also seems unlikely, as there are almost 30 instances of this process running nicely for days. Thanks, Mathieu