Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> [...]
> A better fix would be to not guess and instead pass #:name and #:version
> to all the build phases, with the value taken from the <package> object.
> (That’s a world-rebuild fix though.)
>
> WDYT?
>
>> This is related to issue #48208, and also probably to issue #41437.
>
> Perhaps we can find a workaround for these?

Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus@gmail.com> skribis:

> If chaining  `package-name->name+version` function  may affect a large
> layer of infrastructure here is could a quick adhoc workaround:
>
> sbcl-3d-vectors -> sbcl-cl3d-vectors
> sbcl-3d-vectors -> sbcl-three-d-vectors
> sbcl-3d-vectors -> sbcl-iiid-vectors
>
> Or use any predictable common prefix which could be use and replaced
> after the function is reviewed.

I agree that having '#:name' and '#:version' available in the build
phases would be ideal.
Meanwhile I found a workaround for the asdf-build-system that fixes
bug#41437 and allows building the 'sbcl-3d-vectors' and
'sbcl-3d-matrices' packages of bug#48208 without having to mangle the
package names. It rebuilds all the Common Lisp packages, but that
doesn't take too much time.
WDYT?