* bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
@ 2023-12-14 20:33 Maxim Cournoyer
2023-12-15 6:04 ` John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2023-12-14 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 67829; +Cc: John Kehayias
Hello,
qtwebengine was marked as newly failing by Cuirass on Berlin, as a
result to the xorg-server update in
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=8083c7abbf3a346162fcc4b8d5aa50555c0f3179.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
v8_use_external_startup_data=false
CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-qtwebengine-6.5.2.drv-0/qtwebengine-everywhere-src-6.5.2/cmake/Gn.cmake:75 (message):
-- GN FAILED
ERROR at //BUILD.gn:1652:1: Assertion failed.
assert(
^-----
'target_cpu=x86' is not supported for 'target_os=linux'. Consider omitting
'target_cpu' (default) or using 'target_cpu=x64' instead.
See //BUILD.gn:1653:5:
is_valid_x86_target || target_cpu != "x86" || v8_target_cpu == "arm",
^-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is where it was set.
1
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I don't see how the two would be related, but I've CC'd John in case
they'd have some hunch.
Perhaps some non-deterministic issue with the 'gn' build system? It had
succeeded here: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2803939/details about a
week ago.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
2023-12-14 20:33 bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686 Maxim Cournoyer
@ 2023-12-15 6:04 ` John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2023-12-16 17:34 ` Efraim Flashner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2023-12-15 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxim Cournoyer; +Cc: 67829, Efraim Flashner
Hello Maxim,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:33 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> qtwebengine was marked as newly failing by Cuirass on Berlin, as a
This "newly failing" is the same false alarm as we saw recently. I
think Cuirass gets confused on same package with different versions as
the only one I see on i686-linux building in the past year is v5.
> result to the xorg-server update in
> <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=8083c7abbf3a346162fcc4b8d5aa50555c0f3179>.
>
> v8_use_external_startup_data=false
> CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-qtwebengine-6.5.2.drv-0/qtwebengine-everywhere-src-6.5.2/cmake/Gn.cmake:75 (message):
>
>
> -- GN FAILED
>
> ERROR at //BUILD.gn:1652:1: Assertion failed.
>
> assert(
>
> ^-----
>
> 'target_cpu=x86' is not supported for 'target_os=linux'. Consider omitting
> 'target_cpu' (default) or using 'target_cpu=x64' instead.
>
> See //BUILD.gn:1653:5:
>
> is_valid_x86_target || target_cpu != "x86" || v8_target_cpu == "arm",
> ^-------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This is where it was set.
>
> 1
>
> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>
> I don't see how the two would be related, but I've CC'd John in case
> they'd have some hunch.
>
> Perhaps some non-deterministic issue with the 'gn' build system? It had
> succeeded here: <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2803939/details> about a
> week ago.
As for the actual error, no idea (I saw the same thing when I noticed
the "new failure"). But I'm cc'ing Efraim as having figured out the
fix for the other package (sorry don't remember which, qt something)
on i686 recently...
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686
2023-12-15 6:04 ` John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
@ 2023-12-16 17:34 ` Efraim Flashner
2023-12-19 16:46 ` Maxim Cournoyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Efraim Flashner @ 2023-12-16 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Kehayias; +Cc: 67829, Maxim Cournoyer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2910 bytes --]
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 06:04:30AM +0000, John Kehayias wrote:
> Hello Maxim,
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 03:33 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > qtwebengine was marked as newly failing by Cuirass on Berlin, as a
>
> This "newly failing" is the same false alarm as we saw recently. I
> think Cuirass gets confused on same package with different versions as
> the only one I see on i686-linux building in the past year is v5.
>
> > result to the xorg-server update in
> > <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=8083c7abbf3a346162fcc4b8d5aa50555c0f3179>.
> >
> > v8_use_external_startup_data=false
> > CMake Error at /tmp/guix-build-qtwebengine-6.5.2.drv-0/qtwebengine-everywhere-src-6.5.2/cmake/Gn.cmake:75 (message):
> >
> >
> > -- GN FAILED
> >
> > ERROR at //BUILD.gn:1652:1: Assertion failed.
> >
> > assert(
> >
> > ^-----
> >
> > 'target_cpu=x86' is not supported for 'target_os=linux'. Consider omitting
> > 'target_cpu' (default) or using 'target_cpu=x64' instead.
> >
> > See //BUILD.gn:1653:5:
> >
> > is_valid_x86_target || target_cpu != "x86" || v8_target_cpu == "arm",
> > ^-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > This is where it was set.
> >
> > 1
> >
> > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
> >
> > I don't see how the two would be related, but I've CC'd John in case
> > they'd have some hunch.
> >
> > Perhaps some non-deterministic issue with the 'gn' build system? It had
> > succeeded here: <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2803939/details> about a
> > week ago.
>
> As for the actual error, no idea (I saw the same thing when I noticed
> the "new failure"). But I'm cc'ing Efraim as having figured out the
> fix for the other package (sorry don't remember which, qt something)
> on i686 recently...
Upstream chromium removed support for i686 so that's why it's failing.
https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/support-i386.patch/
https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/disable_32bit_node_check.patch/
https://sources.debian.org/src/qt6-webengine/6.6.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/patches/compressing_files.patch/
There's two or three patches we can add to re-enable builds on i686, or
we can mark it as unsupported. I don't have a strong opinion either
way.
It also looks like debian doesn't support very many architectures with
qtwebengine@6
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=qt6-webengine
They also have limited architectures for qtwebengine@5
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=qtwebengine-opensource-src
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-19 16:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-14 20:33 bug#67829: qtwebengine new failure on i686 Maxim Cournoyer
2023-12-15 6:04 ` John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2023-12-16 17:34 ` Efraim Flashner
2023-12-19 16:46 ` Maxim Cournoyer
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).