From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Josefsson Subject: Re: [PATCH] distro: Add util-linux. Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:14:23 +0100 Message-ID: <871uf7f9rk.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfXjU-0000Mx-1R for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:14:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfXjO-0001cc-AM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:14:55 -0500 Received: from static-213-115-179-173.sme.bredbandsbolaget.se ([213.115.179.173]:48920 helo=yxa-v.extundo.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfXjN-0001bF-Tx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:14:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Nikita Karetnikov's message of "Sun, 2 Dec 2012 07:43:45 +0300") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nikita Karetnikov Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Nikita Karetnikov writes: > 3. 'util-linux' uses a lot of licenses. According to > 'README.licensing', it uses GPLv3+, GPLv2+, GPLv2, LGPLv2+, BSD with > advertising, and Public Domain. GPLv2+ is the default license for code > without an explicitly defined license. Btw, what tools from util-linux is it that you believe are important? If the licensing situation is unclear, maybe those could be moved to some GNU project (CoreUtils/InetUtils/...?). /Simon