From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Karetnikov Subject: Re: Porting to mips64el Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:18:44 -0500 Message-ID: <871udvwna6.fsf@karetnikov.org> References: <8738yvnslh.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87y5gfa7t9.fsf@gnu.org> <87vcbjldp5.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87zk0v4e29.fsf@gnu.org> <87wqvzclyj.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87ehi71bl6.fsf@gnu.org> <87pq1rma9g.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87wqvyxvhv.fsf@gnu.org> <87lic3vm8s.fsf@karetnikov.org> <871udv6bny.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2xfk9qb.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87k3rnr61e.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsdl6-0003fS-Ho for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:18:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsdl4-0000rY-3W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:18:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k3rnr61e.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "(unknown date)") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > With --localstatedir=3D/nix/var/nix (see store.scm and config.scm). Actually, it's '--localstatedir=3D/nix/var', but thanks anyway. > Remember: to bootstrap things here, you=E2=80=99re using Nixpkgs. Here i= t=E2=80=99s > Nixpkgs=E2=80=99s glibc that uses kernel.org Linux headers. Yes, I understand that I'm using Nixpkgs. But is it possible to use Linux-libre? > At this point, you don=E2=80=99t want to build Hello. ;-) Instead, you = should > build the bootstrap binaries, as described in HACKING, that will allow > our distro to be self-contained. Make sure to use =E2=80=98core-updates= =E2=80=99 as a > starting point. Ah, I thought that Guix will bootstrap on the fly if there are no bootstrap binaries. As far as I can tell, there are errors in 'HACKING'. Here is a snippet: ./pre-inst-env guix-build \ -e '(@@ (distro packages base) %guile-bootstrap-tarball)' \ --system=3Di686-linux There is no '%guile-bootstrap-tarball' in (distro packages base). I think it should be changed to (distro packages make-bootstrap). Going back to the kernel issue... If I invoke a similar command, it will try to download the kernel from . Is this unavoidable? Nikita --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ7GMmAAoJEM+IQzI9IQ38EbsP/3TujjUN3NL6q4P8FQsAVZuu EIEpULgSitwpfZvfp8BarQ73zJo1dG666c5Ap1xWtifaXMMJXSK+XOywuXHbDSBW 9qq/ihe/tYdk4D1ysf8VHwkzOUGbGrgLsk4oAzBFhkLKPwnxWsUUszKDHQe3znrN LhXnIl+Ug+cbrkddchK7xBu7bkXlM3Kf//byhkO4N3ekM0+kCtlm25Ih3KLY/Lij gq79Om0A/5ravIZLdkgB3Wh2sqp8xnz+r3nCOt1L3IRSPdxhxcrNneseg3+Vmr82 W5clPhXrxnRCwGYy8ZS7Spp2rRK+958xy6lKuZTWTRqUXOayj305uiUBWieR1Tz9 4aka7EHkjd0mfKNdj4MZf7wJuGWTVKs8f5d8HWLCPGwHcd03L/YM8KrJqO0AUowL ed5TguPvi3vpwmhkTkzYsiGSIq7MD4Iqjir6V6V81AebXVxqqmB0fcuEtVShjKID OwmwImgaYkDX/Ddb/6JJWl6FlY6YxrUKfDP/sVbWQNv5J6KXnmBaE7jtZxa/Ap5P 1XeL25I7gy/cJK6o2kp5dX2MfPmyWq+K7KleZrFsKTQQc5FPMuNqVa2h2bx9iSDd CA/LROx+IgGOnqtzdb8KHxiO7BQ0NnE41tcUDrDBwlY37Keo4RLmI4jDYpOB8DrV 7yxWGEcR0srN6nQfuEZ9 =jBrD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--