From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: GSoC?
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:46:21 +0100
Message-ID: <871uc89r82.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87r4kalm4g.fsf@gnu.org> <5126D23B.8080601@gmail.com>
	<87fw0ojud0.fsf@gnu.org> <201302221757.12041.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53645)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1U8whl-0001o4-4b
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:46:44 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1U8whh-0003Mz-VS
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:46:40 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0b:1:123:ca0a:a9ff:fe03:271e] (port=49197
	helo=xanadu.aquilenet.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1U8whh-0003He-Mq
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:46:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201302221757.12041.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:57:11 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:
>> Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com> skribis:
>> > Could this be a GSoC project ? How about packaging a huge piece of
>> > software (I'm thinking about GNOME/KDE, for instance) ?
>> Yes, sounds like a good idea.
>
> Actually, I wondered if this was sufficiently ambitious and motivating...

Of course that=E2=80=99s questionable.  :-)  It=E2=80=99s surely less motiv=
ating than a
Hydra-like thing.

Ludo=E2=80=99.