From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#22115: (no subject) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:51:28 +0100 Message-ID: <871sx4oqhr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878trdr1b9.fsf@gnu.org> <1566bec1d2fd3ff566c73408c084b5b7@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIjNF-0008FX-9I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:52:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIjNC-0004sG-6j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:52:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIjNC-0004s9-2w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:52:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIjNB-0002c0-S3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:52:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1566bec1d2fd3ff566c73408c084b5b7@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Sun, 18 Dec 2016 09:30:42 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Luis Felipe =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo Cc: 22115@debbugs.gnu.org Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: > On 2016-12-18 05:14, ludo@gnu.org wrote: [...] >> Should we just list packages with actual issues? Or should we add >> those >> links? > > > For now, I'd remove the packages without issues. This would help > reduce the size of the page, which is almost 2 MiB (I use 1 MiB as a > limit for desktop browsers). Sounds good. Would you like to make this change? > Soon=E2=84=A2, I'd like to propose a package pages design where the > package-list page indicates if a package has issues, and the package > issues are listed in a package detail page (which does not exist > yet). The current issues page would disappear. But I'll open a > separate bug/proposal for this :) That would be nice! Looking forward to this. :-) Thanks for your feedback, Ludo=E2=80=99.