From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#27152: deprecation warnings with Guile 2.2.2 Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 21:20:03 -0400 Message-ID: <871sr1yiik.fsf@netris.org> References: <87wp8y2ijw.fsf@elephly.net> <87h90091y4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36385) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dGxkY-0007wj-2C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 21:21:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dGxkU-0000Od-OK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 21:21:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dGxkU-0000OP-Kb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 21:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dGxkU-0001WZ-Fm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 21:21:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:39:59 -0700") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 27152@debbugs.gnu.org Maxim Cournoyer writes: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrot= e: > > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > > > I get a couple of deprecation warnings with Guile 2.2.2, for example > > > > Import (ice-9 threads) to have access to `current-processor-count'. > > `_IOFBF' is deprecated. Use the symbol 'block instead. > > We can fix the first one with #:use-module (ice-9 threads). > > The second one is just a pain: in 2.2 one is supposed to write > > (setvbuf port 'block) > > instead of > > (setvbuf port _IOFBF) > > So we could do: > > (cond-expand (guile-2.2 (define _IOFBF 'block)) > (else #t)) > > in some central place (that doesn=E2=80=99t exist), but really, that=E2= =80=99s annoying. > > So I=E2=80=99m tempted to do nothing. > > Note that normally users do not see these deprecation warnings at all. > > Thoughts? > > Why not let good old sed have a run at it? Seems like a simple find and r= eplace operation, and 'block looks nicer than _IOFBF to my eyes. If we did that, then Guix would stop working with guile-2.0. Given that guile-2.2 is not yet available from many popular distros, I think it would be unwise to drop guile-2.0 at this time. Mark