From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#24069: [PATCHv2] Re: bug#24069: gcc man page is broken Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:53:34 +0200 Message-ID: <871smlppn5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160725222342.1fb3bfaa@scratchpost.org> <877ewfx6s8.fsf@gmail.com> <873773vvfr.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87vajy6ey7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <20171002092431.GP26375@macbook42.flashner.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz26h-0004Vv-UP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 10:54:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz26c-0003pY-7Q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 10:54:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz26c-0003pU-3N for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 10:54:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dz26b-0007uc-Td for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 10:54:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20171002092431.GP26375@macbook42.flashner.co.il> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Mon, 2 Oct 2017 12:24:31 +0300") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 24069@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer Efraim Flashner skribis: > I believe this would cause gcc-5 to be rebuilt, which would cause a > world rebuild, so for the moment we also need a native-inputs entry for > gcc-5 making sure that nothing changes, ie: that we're only using > texinfo there, preferably with a note that it should be changed in the > future. Also, you should take a look at gnu/packages/commencement and > make sure that we're not adding perl as a native-input for gcc-boot0 or > for libstdc++, wherever that happens to live (I don't remember off > hand). I think this should go to =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. > I assume it is OK for us to build the man pages for gcc-final (if it > happens) since this is the gcc used for actually building packages, and > I believe the one pulled in for gcc-toolchain. More precisely, building man pages for =E2=80=98gcc-boot0=E2=80=99 is point= less and possibly adds Perl on the graph for no good reason. So if we can arrange to just have man pages in =E2=80=98gcc-final=E2=80=99, we=E2=80=99r= e good. Efraim, could you check whether that works for =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80= =99? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.