From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#28644: Pulseview with modular qt Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:08 +0200 Message-ID: <871smjevtj.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87r2uphhir.fsf@foradis.org> <87wp4h4gbz.fsf@elephly.net> <87poa8gw0x.fsf@foradis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzVFS-00020I-31 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 18:01:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzVFO-0008TK-Vh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 18:01:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzVFO-0008T6-Qz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 18:01:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzVFN-000245-RM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 18:01:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87poa8gw0x.fsf@foradis.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Theodoros Foradis , Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 28644@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Theodoros Foradis writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Theodoros Foradis writes: >> >>> My guess (not being familiar with qt), is that somehow, having the two >>> inputs in different prefixes, causes the problem with the package's >>> build system. I gave a look at the cmake files, but couldn't locate the >>> issue/fix. >> >> You could try to validate your hypothesis by using a union package such >> as it was done for python-pyqt+qscintilla. That package would have only >> one prefix. If that really does make a difference we might be able to >> investigate the issue further. > > Thanks for the union package recommendation. I tried that, but > unfortunately it does not fix the icon issue. > > I see that there is a wip-qt-paths branch in our git repo. I don't > really know its purpose, maybe it's worth to try rebasing it on > master and build pulseview with that? Hello, and sorry for breaking this package! I don't know what the wip-qt-paths branch is for, but it looks like a good place to fix the problem, and I'm sure Hartmut and =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 would appreci= ate more testers. Can you try rebasing it and see if it makes a difference? I will try to investigate more towards the weekend as I really want to get rid of the monolithic Qt :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlnUCGgACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpcNQgAvuX0RKIiw7mAjpRxBGb2NtfmAF3OIdaqAkZeQ5zD0Ppfi4Dhie0F52go FZ1a4VUEdWDbxyLmfqf7LvapW0a+AgFxBfw70mN40hn+maKRztGJm+g9W6IVFI3p 9khwDO00HYpeF2A3W5EbzOGpQkGn9g5JeOM/jDsc7hkKlf5UBlif0MEKe7Q035k2 idg9zaTazZWAw+COo7G4VbEZDBjZr5BLYK4LyOq479fb4J1wT+Co+daSJkR4qLbD m7w9IgaQMpVLh1j81fZNKrRBg1SRW18WAtOSuxxFA2epKnhMAjib26f0FBK38NE+ W5lsFh3JIrW2PMJZABnMeuXrs54qlQ== =BQ8x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--