Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:

> I haven't looked in to this yet, but maybe it would be possible to
> adjust the code so that it doesn't perform so badly, but still tries to
> handle possible exceptions.
>
> The two ideas I have is to rewrite the (let ...) bit in terms of a fold,
> maybe that would perform better, or stop using let for iteration and
> setup the exception handling, then process each request, using set! to
> update the state. I haven't tested either of these.

I tried something, neither of these things, but just not calling (loop
...) within the catch block. I don't know why this might work, but it
seems to make guix weather much faster.

Here's the patch [1], I've just realised it's broken, as it'll loose the
result value (and use an old one) when the connection is closed. I'll
send a updated patch without this issue in a moment.

1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47288