From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kD0ADyThIWBjOAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 01:11:00 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4FfMCiThIWBBWgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 01:11:00 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB83940105 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52986 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9HYQ-0005LU-T6 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:10:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9HXa-0005Bd-B3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:10:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9HXY-0002G0-Bc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:10:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9HXY-0007qR-68 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:10:04 -0500 Subject: bug#38229: Frequent offloading failures on berlin Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 01:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 38229 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Marius Bakke Mail-Followup-To: 38229@debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune@gmail.com, mbakke@fastmail.com Received: via spool by 38229-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D38229.161283299530072 (code D ref 38229); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 01:10:04 +0000 Received: (at 38229-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2021 01:09:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52191 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9HXP-0007ow-04 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:09:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:45571) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9HXM-0007oP-0m for 38229-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:09:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id m13so19539965wro.12 for <38229-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:09:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=y0j1TkQs+Zeexlj0kU3huDSMobz7eHQNdi7u81347R8=; b=hwDhrLU78C7L6ufHY1QMUthwn2b+Zel82BQZJeF9ztKSa+X4iRMihUcc2U8QbT8umA xzH1UcgK8e/k/OVmfJSTevIiHNN78Rb4YlrCnZZ8FD0uRZskFCNRYG+ExDHOSyTL2UvT QFozeGLGaRS2Mcp5/krD40f53Fbr09lnOnIsKIwP+L9InLApc/VjJyHn/iRaF7azE9EX sTWuNUSRIL/EhtdqdNUGLwa1zVMHPJB5M268JtVwprFMMahuehtfNxdFgFkhCgKT89xS ccL2YruVZLFinBBpNa/Vra6+jah8XPFLBM1s5pkrrQWNkRVb7BKDhUYTt4inwWOCyUQj seTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=y0j1TkQs+Zeexlj0kU3huDSMobz7eHQNdi7u81347R8=; b=YWItLCj3j/FLccGk88MLzXyksKrt+kEdf5MECKXpYgbnCVMF7L5nvn52ttcXucCkgJ s3jgCziIqjhX92+PAbtP5A5CFBQ+lX4WZovNH8ahPnwPHglds24U5GEfSJTr59nIigI9 +avkp1EaDtZs7S+sKcAIhkDQN2QjooB+90DYwDcVBp70Ez7V1qakqqvwa5O5Au5V2BEe 2j5qJujLvSH+Lje06+w+EAjgawFK3PieutGASWOj4YFWM/c8CKjnYkF3zsyShf0qrjDK gm21AnIsAtTQz2uLyQfHed2oGDFZ6xZOll8qfJZGv63D+2TnRJKHdc0dHdHQn+Y7JMh4 q8CQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530U/jfOqhAyZ7ehItJfoVgJOkz36N1fGklY6cuG8G/mEOaYxCYY YKEtnSeDdFOqsEJmoIJU+LwYo0BtX2w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0eW7k+jJheb+D6DEsCWV1vcJZOnkYcnObtWDmC6PNLs2QsY5yX7FT/nNPtZlGZlV3J61xIA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1547:: with SMTP id 7mr22838547wry.301.1612832986550; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:09:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w4sm1466413wmc.13.2021.02.08.17.09.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:09:45 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun References: <87lfsgezyd.fsf@devup.no> <86sg80rjoa.fsf@gmail.com> <86a6tfsda1.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 02:01:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86a6tfsda1.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:29:10 +0100") Message-ID: <86y2fyjbqa.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 38229-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.26 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=hwDhrLU7; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: DFB83940105 X-Spam-Score: -1.26 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: cvDZDT3pHPgV Hi, On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 16:29, zimoun wrote: > On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 09:00, zimoun wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 14:02, Marius Bakke wrote: >> >>> Since recently, Berlin sporadically fails during offloading with a >>> message such as... > > [...] > >>> This seems to happen randomly, at different times and different machines. >> >> Does this bug is still relevant? First, it appears transient and second >> the CI is already work-in-progress. >> >> If it is not transient, could you add more context when it happens? > > Since it appears to me transient and without any moreinfo, I am planning > to close this issue in the coming days. If any objection, please reopen. All the best, simon