From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: bug#26441: =?UTF-8?Q?Gnulib=E2=80=99s_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98test-lock=E2=80=99?= fails to complete on machines with >= 32 cores Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:01:16 +0200 Message-ID: <86shleatk3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871sszuznt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyEA9-0006wp-4v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:02:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyEA6-0004qC-35 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:02:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyEA5-0004q2-WF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:02:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cyEA5-0007iS-Lx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:02:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyE9G-0006Vd-Ao for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:01:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyE9C-0004K1-Fy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:01:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <871sszuznt.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 26441@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, > This may be fixed by Gnulib commit > 480d374e596a0ee3fed168ab42cd84c313ad3c89 (not present in On gettext, commit 1afbcb06fded2a427b761dd1615b1e48e1e853cc seems to fix the problem. I ran three consecutive tests : --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- mathieu@elbruz /tmp/guix-build-gettext-next-0.19.8.1.drv-0/gettext-0.19.8.1$ time ./gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/.libs/test-lock Starting test_lock ... OK Starting test_rwlock ... OK Starting test_recursive_lock ... OK Starting test_once ... OK real 3m50.493s user 31m15.128s sys 6m15.440s mathieu@elbruz /tmp/guix-build-gettext-next-0.19.8.1.drv-0/gettext-0.19.8.1$ time ./gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/.libs/test-lock Starting test_lock ... OK Starting test_rwlock ... OK Starting test_recursive_lock ... OK Starting test_once ... OK real 4m11.575s user 34m10.304s sys 6m46.288s mathieu@elbruz /tmp/guix-build-gettext-next-0.19.8.1.drv-0/gettext-0.19.8.1$ time ./gettext-tools/gnulib-tests/.libs/test-lock Starting test_lock ... OK Starting test_rwlock ... OK Starting test_recursive_lock ... OK Starting test_once ... OK real 3m21.155s user 27m6.328s sys 5m27.248s --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Tests succeeds in a reasonable time and it can be backported to our version of gettext. However, I don't fully understand the difference between commit 1afbcb06fded2a427b761dd1615b1e48e1e853cc in gettext and commit 480d374e596a0ee3fed168ab42cd84c313ad3c89 in gnulib. Mathieu