unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Zhu Zihao <all_but_last@163.com>
To: Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>
Cc: 45193@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#45193: Wrapper of Qt programs doesn't extend existing environment variable
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:20:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86pn35wtd5.fsf@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1cc6eb46-813b-ba3c-f796-30d545f35941@crazy-compilers.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1525 bytes --]


Hartmut Goebel writes:

> I agree that leaking the environments variables from the build environment to
> the package is not a good idea. Also we might want to add some filters to avoid
> all imports (including cmake) are going into the wrapping variables - which is
> much easier when dealing with inputs nor strings.

I just check how Nixpkgs do Qt wrapping, it use same strategy like wrap-qt-program.
Since our environment variable only contains the path to inputs, capture
the build-time environment can be forgiven (compare with patch-shebang).

I think the main problem is include unwanted directory accidentally and
increase the closure size. But it looks like an impossible job to do it
automatically. My idea is provide a keyword argument
#:qt-wrap-exclude-inputs to prevent qt-build-system to search unwanted inputs.

BTW, would you like to use prefix wrap for wrap-qt-program in qt-utils.scm?

> If I understand the code correctly,  line 103 of qt-build-system also handle the
> output directories
>
>                              (append (list directory)
>                                      input-directories))))
>
> and the qt-build-system should even handle different outputs (while qt-tuils
> does not):
>
>   (for-each handle-output outputs)
>
> (I may be wrong on this, please double check.

Yes you're right, output was handled. I misunderstood the code before. 

-- 
Retrieve my PGP public key:

  gpg --recv-keys D47A9C8B2AE3905B563D9135BE42B352A9F6821F

Zihao

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 255 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-19 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-12  9:11 bug#45193: Wrapper of Qt programs doesn't extend existing environment variable Zhu Zihao
     [not found] ` <handler.45193.B.160776432713396.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
2020-12-12  9:19   ` bug#45193: Acknowledgement (Wrapper of Qt programs doesn't extend existing environment variable) Zhu Zihao
2020-12-14 20:45 ` bug#45193: Wrapper of Qt programs doesn't extend existing environment variable Mark H Weaver
2020-12-15  1:50   ` Zhu Zihao
2020-12-17 11:35   ` Zhu Zihao
2020-12-19 13:13 ` Hartmut Goebel
2020-12-19 18:20   ` Zhu Zihao [this message]
2020-12-19 19:12     ` Hartmut Goebel
2021-01-10 16:34   ` Zhu Zihao
2021-01-11  8:17     ` Hartmut Goebel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86pn35wtd5.fsf@163.com \
    --to=all_but_last@163.com \
    --cc=45193@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).