From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2GRyBavtj19BGwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:13:31 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UEk4Aavtj1/sMgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:13:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9242F9409E8 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41962 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV9FR-0000yI-8p for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:13:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV9F0-0000wi-SK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:13:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV9F0-0001g5-HR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:13:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kV9F0-0001HT-BG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44112: SBCL is not reproducible Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 44112 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 44112@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16032679434863 (code B ref -1); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:13:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2020 08:12:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47772 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kV9EN-0001GN-FG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:12:23 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:58932) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kV9EM-0001GG-4t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:12:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40646) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV9EL-0000tx-WA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:12:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:40846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kV9EI-0001JD-76 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:12:21 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id h5so1912481wrv.7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 01:12:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cbHYGB51Iroq46kiDZ3vjZ6334M79H340pSei5uUptM=; b=pCSJ1/yZwzRrVe7QvNDAqTlw0CPx5SIt6dRLp1gH4bFt7NtUTAJPSl0wGf3W+hiIdL 6DNXVqHX9/Uqxxq+/bUWuwDORPXPcosgQfZq16sMs9NfAjsJXVPdUupL1wrurGU6Yssi 08kFvbMuZZr25ef3KClmCN2+VrCvVIUT/kkyhknnJnrxiOOcjuRP6Fh6B/sDK+C55/jB sVsxcN2gdGFitBfkqEq+Q1h/WQtLZ/IeeHnInjZlnx1yGLzoUA4E7ZMclNnXs+gZZ5ab o+hnSEIKq65wP/MXPGqwCeCWvm3pJo5lneloK2iGg75fAMlvmMTDYzowlAioqrRwRdXL SX8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cbHYGB51Iroq46kiDZ3vjZ6334M79H340pSei5uUptM=; b=dmt85YNIWs7vQro2TIpu6uheeqRloIFOTLM1ZKvyuGSy2aIABhKMqjecW5gS6oACbD eHONSOosRKWfI0xKmvXWH36Kf4Q5DK+/qpAgvWYL7j0TVRBi7et0xXsrB0t4C1NcRaAP FSCxwnrhDIUtD4G+kAKib5+5DFsASu7NQOQs8i7sO7M/utKZ19Tv/05GIIga6N5hzneY FmTwBcbeWkyWyyfRYUeGuUoeK93S+rbId308VnjFo3DLE0BTRzSHdn16a0YFc4qxaoWb ozlaUzyGxWvP0qLM4aNBl0Y0yzBcdNkiSEKDWfCROYnhDHYbwc84zc9KIY8qM6v7X32v 3wag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vnRHasmwu5cucRewsKPKmkKcNeV4+7zlwgGX/IAl7B8XlsKQD YPCSuvQuvuObhR3z13iDyPo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKhxatJIYSLMAbcE/xrTPZxsgvj612RII729F1+NChWekkBrg2iUJ/3Ly2KXYAzQbAtmyDGg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f584:: with SMTP id f4mr3088891wro.383.1603267936171; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 01:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x18sm2586164wrg.4.2020.10.21.01.12.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 01:12:15 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:12:14 +0200 Message-ID: <86o8kw80bl.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Pierre Neidhardt Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=pCSJ1/yZ; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: kDLzHDd1Juxg Dear, Using Guix 58af4c9, the package =E2=80=99sbcl=E2=80=99 seems not-reproducib= le. The output of =E2=80=9Cguix challenge=E2=80=9D is: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- differing files: /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-rt.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/uiop.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-cover.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-capstone.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-executable.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-bsd-sockets.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-simple-streams.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-queue.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-gmp.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-aclrepl.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-sprof.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-grovel.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-posix.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/asdf.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-mpfr.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-cltl2.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-concurrency.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-md5.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-introspect.fasl /lib/sbcl/contrib/sb-rotate-byte.fasl /lib/sbcl/sbcl.core /bin/sbcl /share/sbcl/src/runtime/coreparse.o /share/sbcl/src/runtime/sbcl 1 store items were analyzed: - 0 (0.0%) were identical - 1 (100.0%) differed - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- which is confirmed by the experimental Data Service webpage: https://data.guix-patches.cbaines.net/revision/4e0498c4d3f5ef03ac5afa4a3e57= 0205c10c28c5/package-derivation-outputs?search_query=3Dsbcl&output_consiste= ncy=3Dnot-matching&system=3Dx86_64-linux&target=3Dnone&after_path=3D&limit_= results=3D&all_results=3Don I do not know if the patches in =E2=80=99staging=E2=80=99 will fix this. Note that this issue does not imply that the build system =E2=80=99asdf-build-system/sbcl=E2=80=99 is or will be not reproducible. H= owever, this issues cuts any Diverse Double Compiling attempt. All the best, simon