From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wB/kNrGOx18XfgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:55:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 6HPfMrGOx18cSwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:55:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68A539404C6 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53604 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkRf5-0004l8-2l for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:55:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkRew-0004kh-IW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:55:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkRew-0007Nj-8z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:55:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkRew-0005E0-80 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44452 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: divoplade Received: via spool by 44452-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44452.160691368820049 (code B ref 44452); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:55:02 +0000 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2020 12:54:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34663 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkReh-0005DJ-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:54:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:50984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkRef-0005D0-Ok for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:54:46 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id c198so6940759wmd.0 for <44452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:54:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yS0l/TreHIHvCJCU2RKIKRubFD7LrGnV57WYMTuE8js=; b=Cdz1VW+BgPaxjUVeQGRcXg2YIpN9KPt4Xbfwz3AxuBPPR4baj2ZGMBpdWuHjbQkbIc qnFLf/BhOmLQr1gQXN7KTX9ehZTvXW5/G4y09j8XZgPCHH1KDD6mRnLR+6144vhHw3Vk i0Rw/6kpelWHIND43YdqnjNl8Y2YTZx81TshxVmMVVg8ynkm/X4neA2m1mE2jhybu/WP HQSsNKbY35tSXN5Jm+j/lRGgTtD0eESwdd/rnkRjn4uqdpsF0OxkpgK1bWu9AIFEOqs8 +H2P0MwchMWg+eIHlhpPHSxNTWJ4SSGqCxtj4cG5okPYEsFvjjKNGKE2c7geek8P11F1 T8lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yS0l/TreHIHvCJCU2RKIKRubFD7LrGnV57WYMTuE8js=; b=d4BuOh8jtAl6AKd8INVLBenos6NJ6rMKV30uLj5EN6h73pErxaUhwhPjh2WDIoVzYv Oiw+wSL4OvWlRqqCJgz3DDGmcfWFO/RWIbuW0saqEPVQBWWuoExPhYFaBaWKEySJZdM8 M64BdqncLk7pvsJtD0nSln+v9swFJnr3OAIxb7hpDLzprg8TXz8A5a27hW2NujG8W/Ou bbJFo/hIqgL4R3EHIVagw7x9ujOWZ6Ri7KG7C7hstfkIQyFuqFTwmjaoGntpxgT+ROdI mmAQaFTMpRcvEJOd4kUiCPhVNRSihHYmLr0fZjsE7aECyfKbJUjAgfavOCaxI3g4AeIs Zt8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HZ9Wr62X39SYwpAWALZcX+ZDzNIKlG0aqGjwrB650oeVdDnbd qJx2AErogpzODqQEX6C/KQV0b+bXew356w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyY1yULdGjDPk6wmSAaxMNQsruEbFT9qxNQUH1SUaDihDErjtD035HXcucb4D/0YROiRhaU0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:bc02:: with SMTP id m2mr2988741wmf.59.1606913679664; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:54:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9sm2086147wrp.21.2020.12.02.04.54.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:54:38 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> <86mtyxtbig.fsf@gmail.com> <2b467f85aaed6c1a2178278678da648e2170d6a1.camel@divoplade.fr> <86v9dk1mzz.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:50:30 +0100 Message-ID: <86k0u01ieh.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.18 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Cdz1VW+B; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 68A539404C6 X-Spam-Score: -1.18 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: kJ6XbP1Lll7B On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 at 12:48, divoplade wrote: > Le mercredi 02 d=C3=A9cembre 2020 =C3=A0 12:11 +0100, zimoun a =C3=A9crit= : >> Said explicitly, if you do not want in your profile the package X >> belonging to %base-packages , do not add the %base-packages list. :-)=20 >> Or >> create your custom list (remove the ones you do not want). I do not >> see >> what could done on this side. The list %base-packages is 40 packages >> considered as =E2=80=9Ckind of minimal=E2=80=9D to be able to do minimal= stuff. > > I would disagree on that, it contains guile 3.0.4 instead of 3.0.2. > 3.0.4 is not used, and prevents the other guile packages that require > 3.0.2. If it contained 3.0.2 instead, I would 100% agree with what you > said there. Again, sorry to be slow. But I really try to understand. :-) I have been annoyed by such things about different Guile with the website [1]. What I get with 353bdae (pre-1.2) or f4450e8 (post-1.2): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix install guile -p /tmp/guile The following package will be installed: guile 3.0.4 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- so why are you are saying 3.0.4 is not used when it is the default? Well, if I understand correctly, your point is the inconsistency between the default Guile (3.0-latest, i.e., currently 3.0.4) and the Guile (3.0, i.e., currently 3.0.2) used by most packages in guile-xyz.scm, especially when there is bytecode difference. Right? 1: All the best, simon