From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id INWjKti6WWPhGAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:55:20 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4MegKti6WWPUOAEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:55:20 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62F3F393FD for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 00:55:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1onpHg-0007FI-Dy; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:54:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1onpHf-0007Ej-2S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:54:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1onpHe-0001TD-Od for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:54:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1onpHe-0002jh-KG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25752: go incremental builds broken Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25752 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Leo Famulari Cc: 25752@debbugs.gnu.org, Hank Donnay , Efraim Flashner Received: via spool by 25752-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25752.166682480410444 (code B ref 25752); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 25752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2022 22:53:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55487 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1onpH1-0002iJ-U0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:53:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:37552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1onpGq-0002hD-Gl for 25752@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 18:53:12 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id bs21so13054596wrb.4 for <25752@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:53:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uTEt3Anq03CvXFQxwGPQqiI89iLCVdedgchXzHfu2mE=; b=GuP5xGbeNNheQ6UlQB1fDsUjJVRnTtms8lZlGHkuLJNt4fcr666R6jPgJ74/I8lbW4 RfdBaLpAhy2nYP/YGf3DR8+i4gw/TJzm0CaJA+f3vx45AozkWze9/jQaJYfjVYg9jiaD mNRWLwbcHLJ5GUB7eODeg9KjsbDD3KPxdepZQb2JIQhx+aUV5hWYVd7Xj6aCgKij1UfV OTSfoDI//V+m0A5O5FJtBnDPi+B9YcK44gJjlS1IDKeybcInlxXrgjdl3g5QdZ2t03rq hGe77dAoZ97RqFhmfxaUQoGedXzDUDIXhGg4q907vD0vJfrNyZbYjQiEkAO9WzNhq846 LXLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=uTEt3Anq03CvXFQxwGPQqiI89iLCVdedgchXzHfu2mE=; b=FgyagqQ73jO2axZelP7ALRqdtS2/W6hbjTJXB4p8LpDXaQH+dPFVdvz18HLGEzxoNe 15iSUPva4ytf02RTE7xzqVVSy2oXqrw+iC09Bd/y21CB7rtvJJoDT9tzBKhXMhTRy4gq fpRvgx8oTSXA1zmCzS3HNl6GUdbVz4/131QpAG+w/cFcBA8+23G9c8LNYJ+zPcH9/iB2 ywkXQyzrbJpiJGWfBdRVh7MKsNPTNzUG0NYOFEzfceQIkiW70Kt1kWlLJ+m0h/84+ruF rSdSQlbsDV5b9z4q7JgKaG555kPixJaVoiJQ2u518WMrxD+W+Pi8bpi+CE/WZJOGJ9EV jXkA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0pF8cvCi2i8NH0T8GRWm2bNF2PHb6vrqbix5LEUMYj0iL9VBNh M0aCU1vsje01PpFQBjKzFHg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6qeKYUnSBU6znovDwsnCgatTgkfCEf3TUY0FBqz7Bakr45v7h1jRIXWYV/2EOIz0y2Wwm0MA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1842:b0:22e:7bbf:c75 with SMTP id c2-20020a056000184200b0022e7bbf0c75mr30132259wri.547.1666824785721; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s11-20020adfbc0b000000b0022e035a4e93sm6456028wrg.87.2022.10.26.15.53.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun References: <20170225155814.GB3227@jasmine> <86mtyavq9d.fsf@gmail.com> <86zgsftp3c.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:42:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86zgsftp3c.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:43:03 +0200") Message-ID: <86h6zqb9ku.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "bug-Guix" Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1666824920; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=uTEt3Anq03CvXFQxwGPQqiI89iLCVdedgchXzHfu2mE=; b=khni6BSNNGKjTt11ckvrF7QTG3wI03sp6EDZxhpruB5wyjUwZ8cid3w+/pY7Gl4+D9x2eM kSaKWXxtuN3XvqdtpE+CHV+WH9432fxdk2Nyy560hth/k8pY/HWnD3CLbDVMxKPoNJRAtn Rr9XGMFw6K5cmLEhNxBuHHiCJ9dHNHyRUBJvHjQtlOzs5pY4ScboNJTmKMlx+ufmob2sVx MMcY4nDNlNDIgXFMlLoRTnDFgeItJ4FwOlAlR8yCs3osK5DXMnZQmolpjn7GCLZuvmQEb6 WP3ge/xDm5yzKwII8q5OzTNhQHol/RGn6hzBhF0J0C1h3B4EDvoAWJzAz6t72Q== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1666824920; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EsWswP/gflT9IejZ1HYkhDeQ5JBssEuChUizU5VMW7vtdggAKt0slpKbF43oRB8VseJ1Uu NCYlnbRfeiZfG5d24xItVdqlu9uFGnkTV7dGz/wbfddlM4Qnh2kj2Uz7Zs5nfKuAJVvICr cSjPgJb2M42uw+cyzRPfEtyGG6xBrqb4d/nz0upEpEBDcIdAzvjeym29xP/xrVCyFaY4qo u9dvFvsBnP/lRYRefUv7YkyqL28mHfL7h5tsQdMTnmEJ8oj5PsHXVOriXAt6xnWt/imWm3 FvcFMfaJXQvmLIODtO6qz+4JIIofxENR+f62mnA2ZxPVRekvQBRquGs6l1vEGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GuP5xGbe; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 6.48 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=GuP5xGbe; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 62F3F393FD X-Spam-Score: 6.48 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: agITbwj3OR9H Hi, On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 at 12:43, zimoun wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:00:14PM +0100, zimoun wrote: >>> I suspect closing this bug had been forgotten. If yes, feel free to >>> close it. Otherwise, I do not understand what is the next actionable >>> step. >> >> I don't think this bug has been fixed, although I have not checked. >> Currently, Go incremental builds and library re-use is not functional in >> Guix, unless I missed a new development. > > What is the status of this bug? Since I am not using Go at all, it is > hard for me to have a reproducer. Is it possible to provide a > reproducer? Thanks. > PS: I asked the same thing 13 weeks ago. Therefore, without any answer > and giving this bug is really old not so much commented, I propose to > close it. Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 23:38:50 +0200 (1 year, 19 weeks, 5 days ago) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 02:12:36 +0100 (47 weeks, 5 days, 19 hours ago) Go incremental is still not functional but is it worth to keep this report open? Giving the none activity of this bug and no reply about the status after waiting a long time, I will close it if no objection. Cheers, simon