unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr>,
	"Björn Höfling" <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>
Cc: 62071@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars-Dominik Braun <lars@6xq.net>
Subject: bug#62071: openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 23:52:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86h6twy6of.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871qljpz71.fsf@inria.fr>

Hi,

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 10:08, Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> wrote:

>> I was thinking a second time about it and found that not only the newer
>> development of OpenJDK is on GitHub, but also the older versions are
>> available. So I could add another patch like this: 
>>
>> +              (method git-fetch)
>> +              (uri (git-reference
>> +                    (url "https://github.com/openjdk/jdk9")
>
> That’s a good idea.  It shouldn’t change the SHA256 (if it does,
> something’s wrong) so it looks like an no-brainer.

Well, by experience, it is rare that the released tarball contain the
exact same content as the tagged commit.  If it is the case (same SHA256
for both tarball and GitHub tagged release), indeed no-brainer. :-)

Else, some work still remain for the complete preservation of Guix. ;-)

Björn, what is the status of this SHA256?

Cheers,
simon




  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-04 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-09  9:48 bug#62071: openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible Lars-Dominik Braun
2023-03-11 23:06 ` Björn Höfling
2023-03-12 21:00 ` Björn Höfling
2023-03-13 13:50   ` Simon Tournier
2023-03-16  9:12   ` Björn Höfling
2023-03-16 11:48   ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-17 22:10     ` Björn Höfling
2023-03-20  9:08       ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-04-03 21:52         ` Simon Tournier [this message]
2023-03-16 12:37 ` Jonathan Brielmaier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86h6twy6of.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
    --cc=62071@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de \
    --cc=lars@6xq.net \
    --cc=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).