From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id cKpHOb77FmbwOwEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:51:11 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id cKpHOb77FmbwOwEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:51:11 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=de02avA+; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1712782270; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=OariqeBnv32MsOvdh95+VfIgbxvPP+LuTJ1wv2UQFY1ignXKLjmpUxXthdNltkQ0EmziR1 bZG6+Kb6aBSaxFHi2YKrG06deuR3a9xNjdINOjDeAGZrvHfQbbHta0VvlcvZcD1m9YMZQX Z1L5JYTSO3NDJbKVTOOhaAcr/8AKgfKLMtoS5mnFNQ4kVG9HG+SMW6m/hxC+vpqhvBsbrO nB/2bu0rgIBbI6L3wQPbdm/nEWp+1qz9OT3Q3UcE69087Rshlz+pz8Ksnvp7CmZhINQSD7 nfwIfp1zlCLe2XIZXSHoNwMq3XfI8aNwCYXq86cIEfzIUzEcIloxQ6nZyodkPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=de02avA+; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1712782270; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=vVIBvvTLFItn967pUpRa9UTaHQ+UYQW2h9TdTxbyR0g=; b=Kmk8T86Hl7Fl8XsjNopFmVReX/aCVQXUNIJWN9oVD2hEtt9wcm5q+WTImvj2einydotarc ROnQ5iizGfQNK02Yj1EV+JSnbG/6/YGNDVZMXDMdNB9+JOXY8/czqdrgUOH49RYq17scj+ i19PGhsSfEnUhqYud9CmQSHDgVJEh7ro3zVJCsOoiMoSZBbN11rH5loD/lq50GxMh0K1Ec Wx3nYRa0itdaUJcvR1j3NbiHxUbEIBvaww9/Rpb3zXtfex6J7weUAhfOd75VibMSNLRN6k aD11l/WTmc0u0XrhpE5u3M2ji8w598An5vMZv4hUbBIFQYhWvWAhkuQh29o97Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EADA277F6 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:51:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rueuM-00077e-PJ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:51:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rueuG-00074u-6s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:50:56 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rueuF-0007IO-0v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:50:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rueuN-0004GI-LG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:51:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#66866: aarch64 system cross compilation + pinebook pro image broken? Resent-From: David Elsing Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:51:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66866 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: dan , 66866@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Mathieu Othacehe , dev@jpoiret.xyz, ludo@gnu.org, efraim@flashner.co.il, janneke@gnu.org Received: via spool by 66866-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66866.171278222015941 (code B ref 66866); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:51:03 +0000 Received: (at 66866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2024 20:50:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54433 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruete-00048p-Lq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:50:19 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:48723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruetY-00046d-Vp for 66866@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:50:16 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07634240101 for <66866@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:49:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1712782198; bh=1A4LKJaSHw33hHmWVSpgNUG4BC7YRzbnBdVKg6JeIw0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=de02avA+7DgpXyWVfvR+mIrKV1GzAQPc4PhzP3IOfk/5rbgRwwSKn4JVaXT1oooA6 gCOPWk9Hcqrv4qLdQrj7y9FMqx37V3n3OsDoSuyDIYwIllDl0Kw6nt+cmiOU1dP2Za ViFlFbZZ1QbwbbxwZj+jUyEIJpRFmyIAt191uKao3zQs9rD0PrV1eR/k6d+hOL2Y4E 3xYCbwte44WuE9YE8FWeB3GJ37bIBefyWJPN3ZuYuubtHJnWtb+PAHlCsS9eBqna2o hXny3sgbqM1EmpF0VQH5UQ9jcqR5f9r4HAV3dfTzkj/B5tf/gXWeIO3OeT4bQDoJUo 1NGQcKOxZSJsg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VFFM82031z6txv; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:49:55 +0200 (CEST) From: David Elsing In-Reply-To: <00dace82-545c-4443-8129-42c932e02ddc@dan.games> References: <87ttnh5b4g.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6ien6bg.fsf@posteo.net> <87frwn308k.fsf@dan.games> <00dace82-545c-4443-8129-42c932e02ddc@dan.games> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:49:55 +0000 Message-ID: <86frvtvt70.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Spam-Score: -4.47 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4EADA277F6 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.47 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: 0UAJY8oidi08 Hi dan, sorry for the late reply. I didn't yet find the reason why different bootstrap packages are built for the cross build when grafts are applied. This seems possibly like another bug to me, as the package inputs which use copy-build-system do not contain store references and it does not happen when they themselves are built with grafts. dan writes: > Can we put everything inside build-inputs? From my understanding, > copy-build-system shouldn't care about cross-compilation at all. I understand it that way too. In guix/build-system.scm, it is mentioned that build/host/target are used in the sense of the GNU toolchain [1]. There, "build" is the system used for building and "host" is the target system for which the package is built. I guess this was confused when copy-build-system was added [2]. Cheers, David [1] https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.72/html_node/Specifying-Target-Triplets.html [2] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/39599