From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id ONZ9ChyNxl8wbwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:36:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 0H5aBhyNxl/9OgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:36:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 943B99404FF for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 18:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36110 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkAVV-0006YJ-3g for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:36:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkAVN-0006XM-Vw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:36:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkAVN-00051H-OW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:36:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkAVN-0006iT-L2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:36:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25719: "guix package -i" exception should be a normal error message Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25719 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Danny Milosavljevic Received: via spool by 25719-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25719.160684771625755 (code B ref 25719); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 18:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 25719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2020 18:35:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33274 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkAUe-0006hL-5b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:35:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:45096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkAUZ-0006h3-Fo for 25719@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:35:14 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id t4so4193760wrr.12 for <25719@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:35:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=8mn7ozEbnwI0WHuD4CecvXXK10oysecyjUMmJ5rTdR0=; b=ignHz2BhP1/DvHsSyOYM3KRdJcyGGK66jts01W0rhWz/AoTQ/hzt3VhmPUXXKjI3rr KpZ5Ewjvvq4g6hUVL4dZAUmeK6DoD8oFZrDm1zO0plWZhcVHmw0AhM7qn4gOOmD6jvAb e/HX9q6kVmJr7r7IvN9V4be/QTRGYeJKeVEHLm6uQw715CvkgMz+Z7lpv9hGFNPc0tl5 SWsMen2J/G+g+P79N8tOI1tyLGmTQfGMMIWyCDIgj6zGf6y1gnW04tW+BILNh4QOMD1L 8QJUaMZOdEV/hpbCWsyII73xxIeiTnzenxJkq7ze/TK1nal79ubX/m9y9iwMwgzVErQ1 JunA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=8mn7ozEbnwI0WHuD4CecvXXK10oysecyjUMmJ5rTdR0=; b=XeJmz5WBlAbKI6maCK7g29uEmE4aCiIjQ+XLvMnKavufIyVg8+sl78s7A7o3a7Y/hg 47Z3JOgCHSkAyYisR2sYrrGMIUzYxtOhghQT0+OaoLjonCTt4R/JRf+x1B0Rtc4WpdDZ qgiCnGEXHLr03DzHj5C617mVaLEfGVaOX2IE+DPTVp4aV0ukQk30Lo5wGCM+fi/9t98l 7SBa/IZwuKE4Fw4pw8p8VynsvwB7MbnNv4upMm9v1Ah+Pn8FLI04vHRfC/33pZqhoR5p 5vlKK/FfS0vGyKYROD3ujfYJRv7Kv5OVH4+Rms9YuitLD7uMbA4V40c1D0+tUSUMVfpb YNxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xRE15HtFbf6nY7loBsFDJDzTIke2esMiQOopr8p/eKcWXIcAW 2/ivAGZ6WygJ6Cbrwi39tlr49DutBBlQ+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPjOIbDImjsDz25JirsFMG2bAldytyHfPWYT1azFYHGi/+zJxxG2zHiFmxum9QhXsTSA8rmQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:bc13:: with SMTP id s19mr5652797wrg.397.1606847705351; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w3sm1149390wma.3.2020.12.01.10.35.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:35:04 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun References: <20170214094106.73469612@scratchpost.org> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 19:28:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170214094106.73469612@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:41:06 +0100") Message-ID: <868sahv0sj.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 25719@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.31 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ignHz2Bh; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 943B99404FF X-Spam-Score: 0.31 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: 44wwWZPvOZyD Hi Danny, This old bug #25719 is about exception and error message. See: On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 at 09:41, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > When I have network problems sometimes I get a backtrace like this: First, do you still experiment such behaviour? Since it 3 years old. > ... > substitute: 1727: 3 [%start-stack load-stack #] > substitute: 1732: 2 [#] > substitute: In unknown file: > substitute: ?: 1 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/175nlv448nk5kagwwl3zyy2w4726qfz6-guix-0.12.0-4.d9da/bin/.guix-real"] > substitute: In guix/ui.scm: > substitute: 1228: 0 [run-guix-command substitute "--query"] > substitute: > substitute: guix/ui.scm:1228:8: In procedure run-guix-command: > substitute: guix/ui.scm:1228:8: Throw to key `bad-response' with args `("Bad Response-Line: ~s" (""))'. > > It might make sense to > > (a) convert that into a normal runtime error message and What do you mean? > (b) Fallback to substituteless building (maybe only for this thing). Is it not the case currently? All the best, simon