From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id +CaJDGxfLGQdAAAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 19:33:32 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id +Bt2DGxfLGSvhQEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 19:33:32 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7EE119403 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 19:33:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjkWm-00007v-EH; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:33:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjkWl-00007e-Bv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:33:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjkWl-0004Nq-3w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:33:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjkWk-000833-E0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 17:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62294 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Cc: Ethan Blanton , 62294@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 62294-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62294.168062954830888 (code B ref 62294); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 17:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 62294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2023 17:32:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjkWB-000828-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:32:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:41290) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjkW9-00081u-NS for 62294@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 13:32:26 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-2d17b1b21f1so734711f8f.1 for <62294@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 10:32:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680629540; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yMDkMpPIpjXzDJv7aG9+yPAKSL4WFTJXTFy+hLnP814=; b=OMCkkSzDQiVGJdFte/mimP6zws/fSk/Z+8oo9A1LSlxWh7sJGEyCdAj6Njg1LdPody TYw2seNlBhpdISm+7bmEN4SKFBjFeje1B7va0sh8UsfahqBj3KxQAw18ps2vKFMv3mgu tuNVkZI1FlERbjgqlhgEdsKM5jMA7b+I9OGDYpB44SmT+hxBa8XBbg94nB+Struq7bBe BujyloBLdo10Yl04qEbmKFpATHy2/zWpzpDkpk6VB9HtuFpmLoghSIT7TI3C9DktqN3F Z//LkZr54ha7RHpPrCODhUgzrixN+9U1zcUn3ryUbE0oQnzMKATEHjPFIssIo0nW7JYc jdsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680629540; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yMDkMpPIpjXzDJv7aG9+yPAKSL4WFTJXTFy+hLnP814=; b=601oSoGoIOSmqE8zRmMRQ/yFO7MLBA73du25R8wtkdI967jNiRQNavZ2ic1Cw0/xpM w3uO/qvzZP5BJ8MrY74VjqVndWHZA9WL6E4PAqMjtB4V8TQvtwfFqqluiwCkcWFaaEx+ fOAwgZAa6Yf3AtF4u8xJPB9dOSFStvg9uWKZjj38s0+P7oi/upd1eJP8BJYM0uetcfpu /6Cn427JEYVdQp/pr1fHm7m1wblIME26C47RL0rXtdCDJhecwUnCg5cLRGCLfw0Uh8Ht xd+Vj+UvMBUDc7iw7qZG1gRZtb60AmFzsN6uSTKr2Aeeg203ftkFIpgz2QQDrhrAbYA7 YPew== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eHK9eBaFpLkIw0+j+dWSJVHpHWlvkwZ7I2TDzq0jnhtOHryB63 xxr84DH7lTxQ75IoP2AyhFHlcIzagHU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YCdeAOqQb9T6XWPdaFpzpIFLd/HeQxTzVbQMbNRWEL9wpIeYTmmKRFxyk+triQJlAs1fZUJA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f0c:b0:3ef:6257:d0e7 with SMTP id l12-20020a05600c4f0c00b003ef6257d0e7mr406077wmq.2.1680629539541; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 10:32:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v3-20020a1cf703000000b003ed1f6878a5sm16015920wmh.5.2023.04.04.10.32.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 10:32:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier In-Reply-To: References: <868rf8vuz4.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 19:31:47 +0200 Message-ID: <867curtuyk.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1680629611; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=J7vUKNFWwZ/NwpYTai3QcHahfVbX3kFVIaSiURW7PLtILig6zey+9ebCv8bajOlvrCvaAq ko9KVd8nP8ttfdMkPy61PHNfWmE7K41Ey1zvSQ+Ru29zbakucq9W9+cNmNmteZX2hT0HGa 16ZUmWyhe7bBamgTKcrCGc1b3YY+OFfUqzWE15JVQBiJ+r9lvMvnQDx8+YM3MkHgwLHYvj ITum/OzqcZ+GTiIIWoBF+W58FwdHXwCtaxKIlbvIVsyT3g5NRUcx96OB4F5Am0S0yz44vT FUMKbqQw1vFPBXvf7ZnNIYSecLmJ12dgzaainTJ17YAslfHcIZy92/Ph9G4SYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=OMCkkSzD; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1680629611; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=yMDkMpPIpjXzDJv7aG9+yPAKSL4WFTJXTFy+hLnP814=; b=vBbsB9WsDsh3XJRE84P+7Kcw2sUlH+DSigkihIl0TRjHL18GzxO8y8x93iBQK0cLz93k3g QA1W2LKtzS5hUo9ZE+i3/JGcHD3iDCuGdlnkSmJ25RlisCm+DJO68B4nEwc6ENUaRm9t2b 96zGuz9Phy62sEP/gz/nQl/zR3tW3oZ9ZC7eufYuxE5Rpn64Emy8i1zn9qgZU10kBVN83J FprELSCr91x7PA6XS0xFYHb0po5gwY5VjmM70/nb1dg/BNoWiDy1n2k8gJuOgZ09/b14UW C75VRqTBovM/3s7xUOf5624TWWV8xyBCe0yF5Z4cLMLCzchrFmvlPgRCNj4ZGA== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 7.28 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=OMCkkSzD; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Spam-Score: 7.28 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D7EE119403 X-TUID: oNXoYZyw5lDx Hi Leo, On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 at 12:23, Leo Famulari wrote: >> Well, graft does not seem recommended because it would update to two >> versions. And update the package would be a core-updates. >> >> Well, maybe it could be of the current core-updates dance. Could you >> send a patch for core-updates? > > GnuPG does have a large number of dependent packages, but I'd argue > that's either 1) a bug or 2) something we should ignore and update > freely. It's a critical package, and did not used to have such a large > number of dependents. It's really a problem for the distro if we don't > allow ourselves to update packages like this freely. Maybe I am doing something wrong, I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix refresh -l gnupg | cut -f1 -d':' Building the following 1491 packages would ensure 2880 dependent packages are rebuilt --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So the impact is ~10% of all the packages. From a quick look, some packages are intensive to rebuild, to my knowledge. Are you proposing to graft? Cheers, simon