From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2KvyBhn3mV8WMwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:56:25 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id CJVRAhn3mV+mQAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:56:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BD889403CA for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58502 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXuMg-0003VH-JQ for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:56:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXuMO-0003QW-1n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:56:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXuML-0004jk-Sf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:56:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXuML-0003mT-SM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:56:01 -0400 Subject: bug#44272: guix edit doesn't work when $EDITOR is set to "kate" Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 44272 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Nathan Dehnel Mail-Followup-To: 44272@debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune@gmail.com, ncdehnel@gmail.com Received: via spool by 44272-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D44272.160392574614506 (code D ref 44272); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 22:56:01 +0000 Received: (at 44272-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2020 22:55:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXuM5-0003lu-LL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:55:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:55090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXuM4-0003lf-BW for 44272-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:55:44 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id w23so754449wmi.4 for <44272-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:55:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aYh8kOKAn+MKpUUuPMkhoe7pMmMEcNEAQceH8oOqTpQ=; b=N5SLwhZMl9KtioPi2jhSi8h/Q8VS8JUnhrXSrsFeOml8yH6QWWQBOQFrXtB/OUW+gg xtki8iaZ3BG7FCUDaudOZQRBrR37HUOkW6Z9W4YLU0GNrirChaJc/TgLBls2DicB6LO1 DDFYgngLaAhT7C+GE3G+2v5hjMAtkzJUYboB8koiZXk0/GYzq7UO7Rq6hRa0EEcZOVsR q8wVxqm0gC0fDwLEEd+l2A7seYoCdRE39XWzD97pOJnQKubQ0YRXNV/YHvxrpOSsj2RN wMhgjOzIB0HcS6dIkthKaN5HZlBME2kw4akcofMbPpEjndQHR+Th8K8PWpnqFZdToLiZ kz9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aYh8kOKAn+MKpUUuPMkhoe7pMmMEcNEAQceH8oOqTpQ=; b=hvl9/stECwfzNLaf4eBfRMGwmmJj6wtDl/jOFBMr43T00GO6/M4yynfxb+uW5ASYUv qiyS3yVvfvOUOdaaqJQqcXNMSwUVK3K6em7IptKbyudFQPginKsrQ+8HESBnyXzJeKPf Yfn8le39NOXDskrNydgW4KnTXHMrw7aCRHbgn3hArHj0vCoNe+BNIOSvlDFexomM5TSU 2G5Sjfwx5QR2zIUPuL0TruMM9+2xM8SCFdNKRnpDM36ZXvOtQwGuAjgzEkbGJTKTEANq aKXwrhmoow9UHhzevAerd+OhAr9ptSUG8v/b4PEDSzdTl3EFhDcBIWC3/92BCOwSb0bA YGYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ukdGY2GNh39iU99jli6ltQNnqT8fa3jL4dOtp/j7B176dlCL1 jD9PwPOHi+BhuSTKmcl9FtSkvyJarF0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVjbwrLt1s/Z1idD/BZf/tZYsz960WrZo/9fjXbOzJB4UWeVn7x8CZiM9TToj/zZVs3VZuiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7409:: with SMTP id p9mr1033683wmc.167.1603925738135; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b190sm1228628wmd.35.2020.10.28.15.55.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:55:37 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: References: <1a275264117e14a20f28757d8f6511acfd9ea5c9.camel@student.tugraz.at> <868sbq2yjh.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:55:31 +0100 Message-ID: <86361yyn8c.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Leo Prikler , 44272-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=N5SLwhZM; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-TUID: od1B6J32HGub Dear, On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 17:28, Nathan Dehnel wrote: >>As Leo said, it does not seem a bug on the Guix side. Well, what could >> be done on the Guix side? What do you suggest? > Well, guix could pass different flags if EDITOR is set to "kate". Somehow= I > doubt kate would change their command line flags just because an extremely > obscure distro-specific tool treats it the same as other text editors. =C2=AB Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules. =C2=BB Especially when all the other text editors use the same convention. Well, thank you for the report. If many =E2=80=9Ckate=E2=80=9D users reque= st, then maybe =C2=AB Although practicality beats purity. =C2=BB =E2=80=93 from The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters =E2=80=93 :-) > But, whatever. The wrapper works well enough. Thanks. So closing! Thanks, simon