From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swedebugia@riseup.net Subject: bug#33639: ISO installer image is broken on i686 Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 01:35:53 -0800 Message-ID: <8047bf42762c6c4f8106689097afa32d@riseup.net> References: <87d0qfwmih.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUq5j-0008NZ-BN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 04:37:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUq5e-00063Q-Nd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 04:37:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUq5e-00063C-II for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 04:37:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87d0qfwmih.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-Guix , 33639@debbugs.gnu.org On 2018-12-06 01:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote: snip > Indeed, if you spawn the image and run “cat /var/guix/db/db.sqlite”, it > fails with EIO and “attempt to access beyond end of device.” I suspect > the bugs Mark reported at and > are related. > > My guess is that the bug has always existed on ‘core-updates’ since > (‘master’, 2018-11-30, i.e., > just before ‘core-updates’ was merged) shows a successful installation. > > I tried running the ISO image in qemu-system-{x86_64,i386}, with and > without KVM, and the I/O errors are always there, including with a > pre-core-updates QEMU. > > I tried reverting xorriso to 1.4.8 to no avail (which is not surprising > since xorriso was upgraded on 2018-09-18 and the successful installation > above which 2018-11-30.) > > At this point I can only suspect a toolchain issue, probably binutils or > libc since gcc didn’t change. > > Thoughts? > > This is holding the 0.16.0 release and I’m unavailable to do it next > week and with little time over the next few days. Thus I’m considering > exceptionally releasing without the i686 GuixSD install image; thoughts? Ok, I see. Has anybody tested that guix pull from 0.15 -> 0.16 works on an install ISO? (I don't know if we want/agreed to support this at all but 1 bug suggests problems related to https: ) I say go for release and note it on the download page and provide 0.15-i686 image for now. I'm using i686 GuixSD on my devlaptop. -- Cheers Swedebugia