From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: bug#31142: guix package --upgrade reverses the order of packages Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:01:29 +0000 Message-ID: <783C112A-8BD6-4BB6-B20C-65B74F3BF649@gmail.com> References: <87wokko8ki.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87ftr7cgfz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9UfY-00045N-K5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:02:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9UfT-0004Zs-Ig for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:02:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9UfS-0004ZQ-OE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:02:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h9UfS-0003TF-Dw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:02:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87ftr7cgfz.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 31142@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, mail@ambrevar.xyz On March 28, 2019 12:49:04 PM UTC, "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" = wrote: >Hello, > >Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > >> This issue fixes the list order, but it was initially supposed to >address >> https://lists=2Egnu=2Eorg/archive/html/help-guix/2018-04/msg00070=2Ehtm= l=2E >> >> In the linked conversation, the issue that was raised is that "guix >> package --upgrade" always upgrades some (propagated?) inputs, even >when >> there is nothing to upgrade=2E >> >> I can still reproduce this issue on latest Guix=2E >> Anyone else? >> Shall we open a new bug? > >Yes, and I think we=E2=80=99ll close it as =E2=80=9Cwontfix=E2=80=9D=2E = :-) May I ask why? It seems it'd be ideal if packages got upgraded only when n= eeded; the false upgrades pollute the output of an upgrade and makes it les= s useful=2E Maxim