From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id WCOqG8AHcmC7LwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:17:04 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id cG+XFcAHcmDTGQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:17:04 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30A81D043 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:17:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56554 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVK2R-0007Dm-0i for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:17:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVJzW-0006dQ-MU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:14:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVJzW-0003MB-Ex for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVJzW-0001ou-6g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47660: Add link to the ticket when someone reply Resent-From: bo0od Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47660 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxime Devos , Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 47660-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47660.16180856196953 (code B ref 47660); Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 47660) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2021 20:13:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53373 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVJz9-0001o5-2w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:13:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:57246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVJz7-0001nr-9m for 47660@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:13:37 -0400 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FHmQy42X3zDxX6; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 13:13:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1618085610; bh=FL0XRhHKsfVtL2A2XG4NAwCRuRN0kdYT7kAv4EBEwrI=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=WOCdvdPuJ1tovPjADy6dCvWeBft7/4/UmQz0mxz67q/zoBzms8r0askW7vkjncwiQ beZTjQGsGh//+jVMYd5VATWcXbP9z2sQ9ziASSBuIkTM9jZghqDcCQUyic+Gjc71cg PMEwocJMtbWpl78WjJkGMUT3Gkx0UT304dUaSXNg= X-Riseup-User-ID: A2C931E2E151E1A66D70948A8CBD2EFC43A6F5E681017286BC6B29567AC9EBF0 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FHmQw2Zhjz1yBT; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 13:13:27 -0700 (PDT) References: <149fbff7-889c-acc2-09d1-e79edfd29ec0@riseup.net> <3fc025b1-aa56-aec6-5c0a-80f8562f0e8e@riseup.net> <3fb53146-829a-3829-a1b3-2828f6d03e9a@riseup.net> From: bo0od Message-ID: <6496319d-cde6-54bb-5bd7-64e06bf1eab2@riseup.net> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:13:23 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:16:55 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 47660@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1618085823; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=4ogVdGT35KJtQKxpn5bITsKtmdeaWW6Zd8nFUdfTs4Y=; b=M0iLjWjL323HHrv2tuS1MPOUFbz/zYAIGnCK8G2+9dr4N/i26EantLb5wlELUyAoQjnBMZ mST3ieK71yP41QAojFRjJVInBl8Jflg/1ywMOuuUD4QJZbEs7qf07CUZngeML/arj8JYqn 9cxioHOe3MragVC8SjwyxE+me56+gzsBDzpq3OMs/mlDMAEP1n2Fd61wmtHT9zrxqffDfc MgplNgluZo811JgLiRNArKTp93573pL48gu3AgalrUoGmuOT4Wl+AcjxS/sFxvLVVMrLlO YCa0IbecQ2l0Ifox5ghHmwflJ2rczwscgfAKBgriY8vkC85dtmW6qcZNvYZ6IA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1618085823; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=GLeLdmPr5m9q4Oiaj4CPzgV9ZL5tHseRq9KD09rIPsu2nEVe8Iq8PQ/ooxplkYF7xpA2Sw il/3fkuz9lzeFCLp9+Q/Z5ji1qaDEx4ueszRNQ/m7bdsiDIfK4cxSUCS3OhyzUerfcmw1L 1jWRoQw8BuBgIFgGbih7o92jYokysVUDFiEqh6ik1HL56kkibraAQKJ8UjgkJnjGD7xaJu r1EoO9mHbXpvLjqIon10PSOtfkgPcFihaJ0XEEIY7W05GLeJMiHf6yOTqc0sj8rG95JM/O MV/cbyGYA88FKWOt9yqYITHqY8Pg2ufu9eE9NSWzZI8Uei546mZ7+FZiBiZLsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=WOCdvdPu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.34 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=WOCdvdPu; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D30A81D043 X-Spam-Score: -1.34 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: mmUpM9rfQU7d yeah patches provided by email is a mess, thought these stuff are done using git only since guix is rely on it so emails/tickt system just used for answering/solving issues. also thought you were talking about encrypting the messages thats why i asked who uses that. for the spam part i dont know about solution for it, but what i know for sure this is wrong/strange less useful behavior that i dont know any main project doing it. (which is not attaching link for the ticket,actually sometimes they even attach link to the reply itself within the email not just the ticket itself...). Maxime Devos: > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 14:20 +0000, bo0od wrote: >> what are you talking about? who uses PGP/GPG for a public ticket >> tracking system?... > > I do, Chris Marusich does, Léo Le Bouter does, Efraim Flashner does. > I probably could find some more examples in my mail archive somewhere. > Why shouldn't they use PGP? Signing e-mails with PGP allows the > recipient to verify the e-mails actually came from the supposed sender. > > Remember, general discussion is done via e-mails on guix-devel@gnu.org, > bug reports are done via e-mails on bug-guix@gnu.org and NNN@debbugs.gnu.org > and patches are done via e-mails on guix-patches@gnu.org and NNN@debbugs.gnu.org. > > Practical use case: > * I want to test (and, if I were a committer, perhaps merge) one of the gnome > patch series (bug#47643, by Raghav Gururajan and revised by Leo Prikler). > * I look over the source code changes, and don't see any obvious nefariousity, > but perhaps I missed something ... > * I trust Leo Prikler not to introduce non-obvious nefariousity. > > However, e-mail is an unreliable medium, so this patch series might be modified > by an attacker on-route to my system (and the systems of other people) and the > attacker might have introduced non-obious nefariousity. > * I know Leo Prikler signs patch series. The attacker cannot, however, so the > attacker sends the (forged) patch series unsigned. > * /me asks Leo Prikler why the patch series is unsigned. > * The attacker's evil plan is foiled! > > Actually, IIRC, Leo Prikler does not sign patch series. It's just an example! > > Also, regardless of whether PGP is used, the mangling messes up some headers > (DKIM, IIRC), leading to e-mails being marked as spam. IIUC, debbugs or the > mailing list software used to mangle messages, but that is now disabled for > (at least) that reason. > > Greetings, > Maxime. >