From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MBmGCOlAZV+8IgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:21:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 4AprBOlAZV8GNQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:21:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33427940664 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53444 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJPgi-0007DJ-ND for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:21:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJPgc-0007DD-C9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:21:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJPgc-0000Wz-2j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJPgb-0001tY-W4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43498: Guix suggests adding modules that define but don't export the variable Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 43498 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 43498@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16004712027195 (code B ref -1); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:21:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 23:20:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJPfe-0001rr-3G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:20:02 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJPfc-0001rZ-St for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:20:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJPfc-00074X-No for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:20:00 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:45892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJPfa-0000Ih-Fo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:20:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=PurHsnz6kPJisHBBbu1E5L54bY1mf9CACIBwpWn+/Mo=; h=subject:to:from: date; b=glECDhxPIpQaAZH/0c7Tz9t5HjOW6zt34eOzN3gV5e10kUmAPEIQf68rmXezjB wLVOZiYqoV7yBQUKLkumtqFbFdQyJFf4AIhJjGD6T9avnxDYqTfF2L1BZdBWF/e4Th6kKd 5WJvcMjWtMFw9r7OEV7PMwbfGYoAz4XjjjB73ErXZWhMnF7BLspJxCtXnjsllcWIGu++MH W3f9F5DJh8USPj7MWrZ4w49TIHfTC2DFtHtz+C5Wde5fJr8DusY+0TbYdmmwzOrXHaTBbM wB2IpOXWXR/HQGHfJ9hOByG5z4xGp83AgaIjOXR9FmMEfrCd2C1fcHcPyxUyBBbhGHPWmQ == Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bd705b1b for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:19:54 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 01:19:52 +0200 Message-ID: <5ae1de5a5c668d3c31dcf467f7df7696@tobias.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=glECDhxP; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: Wna8ufPrcesc Guix, Quick bug report from tribals on #guix: > Does `gnu/packages/firmware.scm` export `make-arm-trusted-firmware`? > I'm getting error "error: make-arm-trusted-firmware: unbound variable" > "hint: Did you forget `(use-modules (gnu packages firmware))'?" when > trying to use it. And I also did `(use-modules (gnu packages > firmware))` Is it possible for Guix not to suggest private variables, or print a different hint in such cases? Kind regards, T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.