From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id +P52HsczqWHDOgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 21:59:51 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id QLotGsczqWFicgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 20:59:51 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2646B17F8B for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 21:59:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mstBF-0006LM-Hg for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:59:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mst2l-0004TX-D4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:51:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mst2l-00064s-2r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:51:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mst2j-0003SB-Sx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52044: Various Program Settings not Saving and Icons not Recognized Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 20:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52044 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jaft Received: via spool by 52044-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52044.163847825413262 (code B ref 52044); Thu, 02 Dec 2021 20:51:01 +0000 Received: (at 52044) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2021 20:50:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mst2b-0003Rp-Ru for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:50:54 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:37505) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mst2Y-0003Ra-2n for 52044@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:50:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id d9so1343177wrw.4 for <52044@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:50:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sutpAEzJ4giALVJS1g6Tja6Qyc0hSj0wXFJ58AzcHko=; b=R8+Xb/UzyLMZlUL0JunAq1AS7Y8eqc42OT93YFgPpbGE9QTl72gu8e3pDtE1+yWD/3 +MFkM6Fk9NDK0gUHPTzGJ6DFuwkkzyIc6fluqrz//Sh04idvDsGEFqvdhMLwbzSk5Xpy WgEnbeMVAavA7R3bCXhFDRH9w+4ZQ6miag8zlZMQ+F2O8M/STYg65Rtj78BgjKJE+h26 2cmdnf13B5o7sn201jMeUMSv4uQuq4mGXRoZVA1+iTZNs5adxK5TYEmzPfPBoX2WiW+0 v1YotUWbXpaJMvVvtTP1xOZiL4aAtw+uCJEePS8ylS9y8eW1++EBFisikHF5qtqZc6mJ kg0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sutpAEzJ4giALVJS1g6Tja6Qyc0hSj0wXFJ58AzcHko=; b=Hh6JjiHKP4c2yrgWrJ5KmUmzL4uXm8mKjx9dHCGjj1sZooLyWjkWJAEhLzeGTM5jUb Z9mJ4W3VuGZQr6/KiKivLEFdJcjphu8eC2OR7YJvkV5OcHqJ/h9tiYHJkPv+eQB5+MST LrpdAk8YBt3ViAqSWCDduu0R7rztvJUEsSyJcmp7JEpZfHKsCl7GoaV29Yjw1c3QWV9J ePYo4YX5f8cNrbdfflhCjnasAgPR3MAmYYRKnBQNrs4M4YRF/PYWC2GMCcxMT9E+yPjJ IY4ufATHId/VNyZFAA3A5719OR5MgmxVsqdzXd/ORy/5oxJTOjWysnNRDHiPDWYbbnJa Dx0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gcDYvOBROojMpksnDcCyreXXyUXqxdNwZgy3QGFmkwZDzDzVF 7franHZ9iKc3hjyGJAEnErc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+QMJmjo6jcVjP0dtQglsf+4tr4gmLoR89a98RPAhtUfuvYxpKCNO2/LNeUN77FthzwPSJhg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:52c2:: with SMTP id r2mr17173844wrv.548.1638478244011; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:50:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nijino.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm1097052wri.89.2021.12.02.12.50.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:50:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5a6c09390a1e1b37bbb3c7c4a11b1e2e8504d738.camel@gmail.com> From: Liliana Marie Prikler Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 21:50:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1866532794.672338.1638476165513@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1962172575.272360.1637610844717@mail.yahoo.com> <1044076368.6013516.1638103922082@mail.yahoo.com> <3b352ec6a646ae1b11f2d4fef5de0d3fc87658cf.camel@gmail.com> <1720185526.6179045.1638158480513@mail.yahoo.com> <58b9b27f91944f7f398b9eef7acf2d22d8a4c9c2.camel@gmail.com> <418282920.375546.1638411045114@mail.yahoo.com> <2b84f12fceaa4dfa8a99be7d4eb7823bf36d0f0e.camel@gmail.com> <1866532794.672338.1638476165513@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "52044@debbugs.gnu.org" <52044@debbugs.gnu.org> Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1638478791; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=sutpAEzJ4giALVJS1g6Tja6Qyc0hSj0wXFJ58AzcHko=; b=iUBdn8q4yObc8NjOZynwCGvO6PnnPpf/pdbhj+Bo2G4DEj2A+vqjr4ypfcdgttxzalDrVg EX0yRBC4WtAHbtQytDuksivvh5vP57gzdeBzHmS3ro7TwyEnUNEQYOYfCWjmvhHAEwFk7p woIN43f3kLDJkOQ/fM3UzTgVp34QYTCaVw/7R3bzHtDr+r983NqPn/Wdty2NDXUOldAY2W DrlxJwwR0AFLLAxEvZV0zjdPLCVJf/CMBo71qgh9vSRjoQZB0c1VRXbAiWByXw4ucWORVn 3dXmC+hFXsfgOKorJt4GoKck/ZITtkg38LHkztEu28c0z2ZmrrNYBLumSiciAw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1638478791; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=D/9JiWLgjg/7SbTa4aUX3ZT4amCRJKsTqvaX273wKHOotiKTTBbEN+1umhi5oUgHmHgbYj USjMoumpyqe9EEa0aihKd8V9DS6YH1aUC39KtqadfqGE9v+c2hU3mnDoiPN8QLdaArA873 fRumky6p+t6boNsXsDeJfHHBstpzpoLeEZfkDItNNdAAzmUuySmRrI1vTmULEKiHlIgQdN 1nax1fkuvF6CYVN069aB8YGmQZYFw+QA6KQgZANKfhgp/U8Lzzh47egwEchGTqGdVCSdBl xMhIj9PKYvAbR2Gs5gmK6ZXYngPPi99IJrDZ2WCxCe/C4yJpJVndD7eVfa301A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="R8+Xb/Uz"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.82 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b="R8+Xb/Uz"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2646B17F8B X-Spam-Score: -1.82 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: WQF7OhirFQ6y Am Donnerstag, den 02.12.2021, 20:16 +0000 schrieb Jaft: > > Am Donnerstag, den 02.12.2021, 02:10 +0000 schrieb Jaft: > > > I had noticed that the core-updates-frozen branch had been merged > > > so > > > I upgraded but found things pretty much the same as before. > > Please come back, you're within the wrong timeline. > > Oh, I don't mean that I used another branch; I saw it got merged to > master (I believe) so I just did a guix pull and then guix upgrade. > I'm still using stable. Sorry about the confusion! I am jokingly referring to the fact that core-updates-frozen is not yet merged to master. If you do live two years in the future, please tell me the lotto numbers. I need them before I die. > > > I saw an old patch ( > > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=e311ef4f87f7ad8db2114e5f89961eea0240893b > > > ) and, while I'd checked rofi for gdk-pixbuf+svg – before –, – > > > somehow – it made me think to check librsvg, this time, and found > > > that it was using gdk-pixbuf, rather than gdk-pixbuf+svg. I then > > > made a package inheriting librsvg but using gdk-pixbuf+svg, > > > instead, and made a package which inherited rofi but used my > > > librsvg package and, with that installed, rofi worked with .svgs, > > > then. > > > > > > Am I right in assuming librsvg ought to be using the latter, as > > > the library deals directly with handling SVGs? If so, I can put > > > together a patch to submit. > > Have you checked using gdk-pixbuf+svg as input to rofi directly? I > > don't see why we would have to go in circles for librsvg, the > > component you're trying to use is gdk-pixbuf. > > I just checked and it does; I was going off of the package formation > in Guix but, checking the listed dependencies on the rofi GitHub page > ( > https://github.com/davatorium/rofi/blob/next/INSTALL.md#external-libraries > ), it does list gdk-pixbuf as one so, perhaps, it makes more sense to > build with that instead of librsvg. > > I had assumed the package inputs for rofi were already accurate and, > if gdk-pixbuf doesn't have SVG support while gdk-pixbuf+svg does, it > seemed plausible that gdk-pixbuf+svg would be the preferred package > for librsvg as librsvg is dealing with SVGs, perhaps part of the > reason for SVG icons not getting rendered in applications like > Thunar, XFCE, etc. (that being said, I'm unfamiliar with the librsvg > code so, perhaps, this assumption of how the gdk-pixbuf dependency is > being used is incorrect, on my part). Writing a short letter takes time. So to summarize, librsvg is not actually a dependency of rofi, gdk-pixbuf (with SVG support) is. Anything missing? > In any case, librsvg is not listed as a dependency for rofi while > gdk-pixbuf is and swapping librsvg for gdk-pixbuf+svg in the rofi > package still seemed to build it alright (and render SVGs) so, at > least directly for rofi, directly using dgk-pixbuf+svg would still > solve the SVG issue for it. Now that that's cleared up, you might want to synthesize a patch from it. Is there anything else that was swept under the rug and that we'd need to actually resolve before closing this bug after fixing rofi? Cheers