From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Sturmfels Subject: bug#27264: gnome-shell-3.24.2 consistently dies during initialization Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:39:04 +1000 Message-ID: <5938FF18.2090706@stumbles.id.au> References: <87o9u13e4i.fsf@netris.org> <8760g8t769.fsf@gnu.org> <87shjbwjdc.fsf@netris.org> <8760g7nhhx.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gexi6XPAn7xs2nRPGbB2hxHCbEva34RnK" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37697) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIs35-0002u1-As for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 03:40:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIs30-0003Pb-Fo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 03:40:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIs30-0003PV-CI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 03:40:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dIs30-0004Uv-2F for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 03:40:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8760g7nhhx.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke , Mark H Weaver , Roel Janssen Cc: 27264@debbugs.gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --gexi6XPAn7xs2nRPGbB2hxHCbEva34RnK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/06/17 16:03, Marius Bakke wrote: > Mark H Weaver writes: >> >> I have a question: Does GNOME 3 work for *anyone* in Guix now? If so,= >> that would be useful information. If not, I wonder why this got merge= d >> into master. >=20 > I'm sorry, I don't actually use GNOME and should have tested it before > pushing. I have been busy lately and didn't want to hold up the branch.= >=20 > It would be good to have a system test for GNOME and other DEs so we ca= n > catch these problems earlier. >=20 > I'll try to help fixing this later today, but feel free to revert the > updates meanwhile. That aside, thanks for your all your great packaging work Marius! I really appreciate it! :D --gexi6XPAn7xs2nRPGbB2hxHCbEva34RnK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJZOP8YAAoJEAI8BeLJwGjwL+4P/3Y1YQgXOmqtW+Vw04AMbQUz 3ZhIhGqE/f/zC53KYtERy+0AGnYAEy6fkSH1wYAwesae0Y7j3imqInsntZ2vwYs1 hixdWaWFlU3KCcfQRRsiR5ijb0dEbCsq3QzKmTMUTM0w2VqOZTebnbeVKqYyN6qR A01UUPq6Uo9877E6cV+IC9E6c/fMGr4oazQ7eMwereOHqbGcWCVXnw/2dyjxW53V JuPPDd1U79+dDFmAivRTPZaSS0zMncrbR7UY1VWb6Zz5JRf9qvOkXREGIBUdCKYY NDoP6xfx1diW1qDJqsiifMNwJQ58HpR8zzbdho/daivgVHuOZ+2NyCz9aUCCbnL2 XibnM87ARFhMWiU7V16Wyu6JZMyuzv0fatdZKPA5ovZZ9gfq0gl1S8CKDp3Hl99J +cgWo0qjybHGuiCgGgMkGPEljOYZXJftcvo83k8b00Zh8v1PtV7sw8qonpFXeZ1D kRkV6ZPXI7cpITB25Vs/KEa8s1xpZWEaXTUmcb4gnm79gItt7QOUROWcg297WAs3 f55J5s69zYJIgm50F/fYy6uPuAFohGo79MmLZGboU0jLoxl+3C08YYIKEMVGyOTk 0Q2s03N7R6Rwfb0NA72JfLvBAlbFkm7CT0K9+WrABhkW6U/uH2diCOnJx/5dCb7U 9t0jB/LUKJ8Pdupay0SR =On/z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gexi6XPAn7xs2nRPGbB2hxHCbEva34RnK--