From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: bug#26695: openssh password-authentication? should be #f by default Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:40:35 -0700 Message-ID: <579FDA43-57E9-434D-B563-A29D21A42338@gmail.com> References: <87k264tx8m.fsf@dustycloud.org> <01F8858C-D359-42CA-96A6-45F6C4A3B80C@gmail.com> <87h9184heg.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d48x7-0007bS-Lr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:41:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d48x4-0007oK-In for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:41:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d48x4-0007o9-Ed for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:41:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d48x4-0003nH-95 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:41:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87h9184heg.fsf@dustycloud.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Christopher Allan Webber Cc: 26695@debbugs.gnu.org On April 28, 2017 9:37:59 AM PDT, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: >Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> +1=2E Although it means the keys will have to be copied by another mean >> than the "ssh-copy-id" script=2E Maybe the configuration could accept >> the public key? :) I haven't checked if this is already possible=2E > >We have discussed in the past having some service that just copies some >static files on init=2E That would be enough to set up public keys >appropriately=2E > >That's a different, but related bug :) I see! Indeed, it seems it would solve the problem to have such service=2E= Thanks for the reply!