From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id ANEfN97QZ18QEwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:59:58 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id wN/cMt7QZ1+bGAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:59:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82EBC94014E for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43688 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kK78R-0002rI-He for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:44:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kK714-00019r-2Q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:37:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kK713-0003Ii-Om for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:37:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kK713-0006oD-MW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43534: qemu-minimal-5.1.0 fails to build during test phase on aarch64 Resent-From: Stefan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43534 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Received: via spool by 43534-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43534.160063781226158 (code B ref 43534); Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 43534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2020 21:36:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kK70u-0006np-1I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:36:52 -0400 Received: from vsmx011.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net ([153.92.174.89]:21907) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kK70q-0006na-Jx for 43534@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:36:50 -0400 Received: from vsmx003.vodafonemail.xion.oxcs.net (unknown [192.168.75.197]) by mta-5-out.mta.xion.oxcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC2B59CFBF; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from macbook-pro.kuh-wiese.my-router.de (unknown [2.206.141.21]) by mta-7-out.mta.xion.oxcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A6970539A44; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Stefan In-Reply-To: <87bli0e2qw.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 23:36:36 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <56B769EB-B804-495F-9091-E4E95A5CBB68@vodafonemail.de> References: <87bli0e2qw.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-VADE-STATUS: LEGIT X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:44:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 43534@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.99 X-TUID: eTTXQWurJBcu Hi Maxim! > Do you think this is a regression? I doubt so, because even before > pushing the update to 5.1.0, the test suite of qemu (not qemu-minimal) > was failing on master. I don=E2=80=99t know. Until today I always got a substitute. There was = at least a successful build in late August. = http://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=3Dsystem%3Aaarch64-linux+spec%3Aguix-m= aster+qemu-minimal-5 > The error in the log you posted appear to be: >=20 > = ERROR:tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c:508:test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kv= m: assertion failed: (resp_has_props(_resp)) > ERROR arm-cpu-features - Bail out! = ERROR:tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c:508:test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kv= m: assertion failed: (resp_has_props(_resp)) I only searched for =E2=80=9CFAIL=E2=80=9D. :-) The same test was passing in August. = http://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/391wav2qcfd1wkss2ssv408zhbgcxhq7-qemu-minimal-5= .0.0 MALLOC_PERTURB_=3D${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$(( ${RANDOM:-0} % 255 + 1))} = QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=3Darm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm QTEST_QEMU_IMG=3Dqemu-img = tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features -m=3Dquick -k --tap < /dev/null | = ./scripts/tap-driver.pl --test-name=3D"arm-cpu-features"=20 PASS 1 arm-cpu-features /arm/arm/query-cpu-model-expansion =E2=80=A6 MALLOC_PERTURB_=3D${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$(( ${RANDOM:-0} % 255 + 1))} = QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=3Daarch64-softmmu/qemu-system-aarch64 = QTEST_QEMU_IMG=3Dqemu-img tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features -m=3Dquick -k = --tap < /dev/null | ./scripts/tap-driver.pl = --test-name=3D"arm-cpu-features"=20 PASS 1 arm-cpu-features /aarch64/arm/query-cpu-model-expansion PASS 2 arm-cpu-features /aarch64/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion PASS 3 arm-cpu-features = /aarch64/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-off PASS 4 arm-cpu-features = /aarch64/arm/max/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-max-vq-8 PASS 5 arm-cpu-features = /aarch64/arm/max/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-off Bye Stefan