From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id CBqoK5SAgWEJGgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:16:52 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id EAxTJ5SAgWF1DwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 18:16:52 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51EB2BD05 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:16:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36452 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhyL5-0006At-Cd for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:16:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhyGQ-0008Fd-Rq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:12:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhyGQ-000076-JW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:12:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhyGQ-0000lJ-7R for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#51564: [PATCH] gnu: webkitgtk: Fix configure failures. Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 18:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51564 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver , Leo Famulari , 51564@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 51564-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51564.16358766692856 (code B ref 51564); Tue, 02 Nov 2021 18:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 51564) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2021 18:11:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhyFZ-0000k0-Af for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:11:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:37735) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhyFX-0000jZ-Fk for 51564@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:11:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id b12so30203211wrh.4 for <51564@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:11:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mboFj3qRyVI5rEBRf9yAwyVeD1W9nG2Bfz0p4n3dUtQ=; b=J9WCJXJqImn9RoUdANSg3zU+1RAlPaQLnY2avQOg+qX7AK3HvhRopNalQ478uHiyAs K06zGCXCHSiEQh+2XBQQIZ0qpn3zwBxDvLm4fs6yJuZY+5E704ZiAYM6SqfK5f95KjJT YVU9xC8n0bBPCiaekXWMvGNa1v8pyg4A4zFN8ubW3R5os1kUaKtCmtTGfYIZp5SstimX 33LHifS/b4+Bre+l5CLoqPdEhDksI7gP8U6LGFFzI1l573hZr5T6033QXar9Yjct9j4k oJnSuuhRUGDiH5zwXDbStkVT55MIeZvKmFspL6iGoU75PHw8lMjNgyPCcMC8r5eYnOh/ UNqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mboFj3qRyVI5rEBRf9yAwyVeD1W9nG2Bfz0p4n3dUtQ=; b=GMq2MwwPgK1XObTJDvPilWGulDzm4oFsdslGNANFTnF72BsGzP0Bhpj7ps7p5ZzWhj 5mkTxr8ZUlEpwgcsG4j5MJ/3fJoJV1AhYDy6lD9IBt8IFGDaV6nDDMl3zplwokmJArTq PNFv4ZWqWLlcAmXptPzRjkQtdwC45G7IhoqDelKY6HZrD4QPz4iD8Xqr6WVkQqsyFIRB SAq6CqWUoWmj56YeCVzafOghrf1kFKKZRyoB2NVZYPRpk7QUqXds3KmeCvwdBYVek5gz BrXaBZbfWzClonddizzhmXA2mVZWWciO1YHxOYiPzyZ4HBkObjSl7Uy+ar4pTOqWw+4t GOtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338yVbmxDBmbSaQ1UHj4BJZ/RBEV2Lp9cO1xEaxkHDTL2Anrdl3 xcIEqnbvkCNty7YNjhDz5os= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkwCHRMAngTGvtMGTdsMpo71QocB9mWjp25OhgSgHYV2fDAyYAFAsHT+B0DqvR5TJ2+Gsc8w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d49:: with SMTP id k9mr46316902wri.352.1635876661441; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nijino.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d24sm3095919wmb.35.2021.11.02.11.11.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Nov 2021 11:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5298195410bf58cddca122037af828347ef1e02b.camel@gmail.com> From: Liliana Marie Prikler Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:10:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lf26mpjp.fsf@netris.org> References: <9ef270f42ae56ff7ef2729d56eee766aff6c9e54.camel@gmail.com> <87r1bymted.fsf@netris.org> <87lf26mpjp.fsf@netris.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1635877012; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=mboFj3qRyVI5rEBRf9yAwyVeD1W9nG2Bfz0p4n3dUtQ=; b=o+rbvQY6OYogamgxGsZFRP99K/ZHUiuUPZeE7nH/hLaJhHMAGMM9rszA9Jdplw0Tv++y11 ClhYVQL7IpLAR24AEfmkFpDUnBSOmlIo6wl+aY8U/ybpWdDiR5KpUqwtONIVgAxPvRBJDX MI4ZhcFd2XJPGVFkBspd6xVlSVy1rbZp6ywV1WrlpOQt1+5m6kZI6RFBFu+XiNL6eGlX/7 rwnANZsVYxP63NL9IoBnBd8loiwrXATGRSjjR4TLMQZPIXVhVvnFVQvyZ2f6lLdOAVMO5f tvbAzafAA2bFjrgFBwAJILzCvpX0O5WidG/E3bwPfHQd0kKbE6Msxoe7xvmu7A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1635877012; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SXQSOmR4YkhIcqM2+fDve6/bwW3RL/tuVFNkmu6LgyC/2cLxEwH1zBON27xsxcl7d3DmNK lsJQAxIsaG4SmB9sgLjwy8tiYtVaQwDl6iNQlohC1uymmhfgdqfKUGpE3D61e51BQ4siFt Ck5ehkcRzyXCtJUeotf0BWcoMarDmuyXQcwE5Z77hqp8SJw92rhP2A+gCTcfCr4ezZrxVC wVa4aRQ8DOfVA86KtgghP+1mYOr/NthH3Jb8s09g1mfQi5qz7tEYutHIScY+0X//d3kttD Y0uHqDIVXYnPMSf03SXRlzxon0+FzUBo2mvO4F+twoYu11NL1gLIgYrQgMAOrw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=J9WCJXJq; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.32 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=J9WCJXJq; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 51EB2BD05 X-Spam-Score: -1.32 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: ndK8yPISsOeH Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2021, 13:31 -0400 schrieb Mark H Weaver: > Hi Liliana, > > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > > I'm now trying 2.34.4 (same version and hash as c-u-f), which at > > least appears to build further than the bug we both encounter. > > As far as I can tell, WebKitGTK 2.34.4 doesn't yet exist. The newest > version available at ;, and the > only release version that has fixed the announced security flaws, is > 2.34.1, which is the one that we're failing to build successfully > with GCC 7.5. > > The version of WebKitGTK that I see on 'core-updates-frozen' is not > 2.34.4, but rather 2.32.4, which is the version we had on 'master' > before the (apparently untested) security update commit 8797a07ac0. > > Unfortunately that version is vulnerable to CVE-2021-30846, > CVE-2021-30851, and CVE-2021-42762, according to > ;, > > Am I missing something? You're missing how I wasted hours of my life because I misread a version field... *sigh* > I don't have time to work on this today, but I have two suggestions: > (1) look in the upstream git repo for updates that might fix this > issue, > or (2) try using a newer C++ compiler. Is this really an issue with g++? What does upstream use for compilation? (I'd rather refrain from manually trying 8, 9, 10 in succession)