From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
Subject: bug#38491: Evolution is missing GPG
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 13:11:19 +0100
Message-ID: <51e3a6f2bca86b7ad6107ec921c54464f4f6a51e.camel@student.tugraz.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49976)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1icTVo-0004fJ-Gw
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:12:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1icTVl-0003sJ-Io
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:12:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35542)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1icTVk-0003fO-F5
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:12:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1icTVi-0005Yj-9m
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:12:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38491.B.157546150621345@debbugs.gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49877)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>) id 1icTVN-0004Kw-2e
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:11:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>) id 1icTVG-0000gx-JQ
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:11:36 -0500
Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:1437)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>)
 id 1icTVG-00006A-1u
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:11:34 -0500
Received: from nijino.local (213-240-64-42.hdsl.highway.telekom.at
 [213.240.64.42])
 by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47Sd4G6HNmz1LBL5
 for <bug-guix@gnu.org>; Wed,  4 Dec 2019 13:11:26 +0100 (CET)
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: 38491@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Guix,

I recently discovered, that Evolution would complain about a missing
GPG whenever it encounters a signed message.  For the record, I've only
installed evolution-data-server in the operating-system and evolution
itself inside my user profile and not installed gpg in either place,
thus causing this issue.  Would it make sense to make gpg an input to
evolution and hardcode the path in the source?  Or would it perhaps be
better to have it as propagated input?  WDYT?

Regards,
Leo