From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id YKyXLm+cg2bsbwEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 06:21:36 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id YKyXLm+cg2bsbwEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 08:21:35 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=landt.email header.s=MBO0001 header.b="t2w/NZHh"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=landt.email (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1719901295; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=PeBuQtU23ESAvjLnKE/cUjG4CCOefM94AqHhRUvObcM=; b=a7NfOzX5is22tdbSezlJJy8Ew7Wm+sZ/NzB5Lue+QFgjFn61XMErEtDD/8i7r2QbvYkPVJ qrQxfGodZRcWYnOa+zKDNydnVBPxhOBdIVi/CcnCDYqOcmuQA34C9GeqrS6YHlqTQfaIOx 7S9IOTFCXDonVmmW49GxkzMMkxPfIdNlb6qRd4O48JBIcvlMnX82Ud6S9U5Apgv6tZ/I+M EL1Xyr0ga4z3Bh7knkHAQhTBg0V1Y/ZsNSHiy+XxAKuPZltHk7CDgeH0YgFdUhZLGqEVXg 7wnObuvZXxCIAghJL7eNs0Yb7c2WYbA2b0C9JLuvGH4KiXErQKTsu8cNwuzMMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=landt.email header.s=MBO0001 header.b="t2w/NZHh"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=landt.email (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1719901295; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dMC22QEa9x84/Hnx8NYknsx/fVCYeCOOo4me+8LVBR2lENvr3viltxIFQ5SLCt+PciGjKc r5qZ/I13qy8u5UDk2utuiztcdkyNoglXrL2eVnZ0YDDmk+zrM/soGy33avAA+1oboSqdVB imCmrpV7v43fhQnDlZTOX+IiGhCbgtKd86zZEGnTZ0P3OF9sjVnWcURSWihZkNumADiIDC 44aPZnpJtrtAccGA39YsfqElCvG1x3rNfSCgNb8ynql+c7PMNJ+dvLNW2jkS4RJphLy44u rEXNcOv0zfdzkvnh+Bccb7QmMvS4hq89AhmDtb4zFBtKrBtcp1MfH/k4NUjZfg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99DFB6055E for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:21:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOWt2-0000DJ-9z; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:21:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOWsz-0000Cq-LV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:21:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOWsw-0007BH-DK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:21:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sOWsw-00066x-0v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#71870: Some broken Go packages (including Podman) Resent-From: Nils Landt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 06:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71870 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: jgart , 71870@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 71870-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71870.171990125823472 (code B ref 71870); Tue, 02 Jul 2024 06:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 71870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2024 06:20:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sOWsr-00066W-Jz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:20:57 -0400 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]:38492) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sOWsm-00066D-4D for 71870@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 02:20:56 -0400 Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WCt7v1Sc6z9sWS; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:20:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=landt.email; s=MBO0001; t=1719901243; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PeBuQtU23ESAvjLnKE/cUjG4CCOefM94AqHhRUvObcM=; b=t2w/NZHhoO4yaAh0ZQ7zhPCHyvepk8oac1/Ln0Rtcf6By9Sqss2+D63MCL/B4SPnJ2205A brTfRvXyTyybS5FrBJTva7dbdzDo6GzgwjaLiZhsaxrq/E842j1u7PniiyWSDqrGSLuIV9 zqN5z/kt0qmBRd4/a/LPs4+B1s21GEHqT+mGFEJKSLkg4d1F0AlutDdW/spg8wKaW85NAg pBGOFoFgsJrVWextahm0M2PJxmLvxs8ugT0tNUMMreWDvbTGNdPB7dlpjF/2E11EJSZ9yn j1ZDK50ILudlY05Eu1r4y3whk4lUoQBzSnrEounjxZ13+39C+7jMVJNq8O9ZxA== Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:20:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Nils Landt Message-ID: <479449617.175721.1719901242517@office.mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: <35d9a037be458b7f3e9b88ddbf9c7b877bfe9028@dismail.de> References: <602050338.91939.1719819308299@office.mailbox.org> <871q4dw56z.fsf@dismail.de> <1191618923.144212.1719845034655@office.mailbox.org> <35d9a037be458b7f3e9b88ddbf9c7b877bfe9028@dismail.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WCt7v1Sc6z9sWS X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 99DFB6055E X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.98 X-Spam-Score: -3.98 X-TUID: /1CBb9rcVAKZ > jgart hat am 01.07.2024 19:04 CEST geschrieben: > > > > No, the patch submission process is too annoying for me. > > > > Hi Nils, > > Sorry to hear that. I can relate to that as I've also been annoyed by aspects of the process. > > Can you share some of the pain points that you've experienced with the patch submission process? > > This will help us potentially address that and open discussion around it. > > How do you think that the patch submission process can be improved? Nothing that hasn't been talked about for years, really. - Patch submission workflow without email - Code review tool with threaded at-code conversations - Code formatter that I can make work for vim (i.e. guix style for non-packages) - Useful commit messages instead of GNU ChangeLog My previous attempt at contribution (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66557) was quite unpleasant. I don't know how to phrase my critique of the reviewers in a constructive manner, given that I respect we're all human beings volunteering time for this hobby. > I'm going to give a talk in August at the Guix London meetup on patch review, the mumi CLI tool, and my current personal workflow. I will be watching the recording, but I don't see how it would address my wishlist :)