From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id ELHRA3MsqGFDCgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 03:16:19 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id MLELO3IsqGHYBgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 02:16:18 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19D21051F for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 03:16:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msbdw-0003XD-R5 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:16:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msbdi-0003Wo-Pi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:16:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msbdi-0000hb-IR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:16:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1msbdi-0001h5-9q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52044: Various Program Settings not Saving and Icons not Recognized Resent-From: Jaft Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 02:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52044 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Liliana Marie Prikler Cc: "52044@debbugs.gnu.org" <52044@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 52044-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52044.16384113466486 (code B ref 52044); Thu, 02 Dec 2021 02:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 52044) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2021 02:15:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1msbdS-0001gX-3R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:15:46 -0500 Received: from sonic317-33.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.184.44]:39132) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1msbdP-0001gI-6y for 52044@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:15:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1638411336; bh=1/g4exfI1tFcOR0yvvnS909IoilsUMKa69KBnCdpf6Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=FlGnsSC+ogUdGdliD73kAqXcL+fZHkIfKLBbimuAMGEUUeBsNIUtZiUQcm36w/ggt//2MjWq6gUK4EhDjLFaFeVCQ50NDuZWTPLy7A1/aiIniaLUIgQhDLi/VEVPb4t8RV3r0zU2saHfrl2hHDj0Kdx3Pp0UM5kGvI67ZCNp43xMPiJ45HibJzOFhdiuK+zv4mSKxTC72gzOKeTN3lYCMrcXkDE5GIxz60rMzvBEZ9MFsMOPzJDcF22SagCq6NcaaGXj2xl39p/XGTKL/3jiFkYFBJCSEsaQv70fdPcP0SWsIWq4KYmfAHcWmq+DIfL3Z74HFZessv9EnYNAKd2/Ng== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1638411336; bh=Q50Tef4HtM3+/hLDiSgir/Ha5S2uk8USGeQ1swzDvRj=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=Ma+IaRRjdG3pHxHC/l4KBAFSPA+QtB4yNUpqVoDXFCV9nrZLxif3mmpDlRVUe46kqmfExCIpfLs7DbzvbrzKgLlH2zNiZUBfGcfyYm95Hd0NBHKXVNKCS013TqiAOoHdrW8MnxvmgvgIkZ45wPPyTVB9XgiK370c0+XdyZpNeGDKozXH6mTFsqvFROAdRhGKsZCbpPbjEE2YNC6WnwB98ppDD5bPmgyfk1n8PJLq3Vf+HjGpy0v2ZKGFrNRxT/rLfOt8Z4qyO5AJSokzbZLOvqSkp63NVl61Lv128MM4IJPz5osR/i8XLTC4aN36slzrrBwYm2+zdzlBsS8KGCkIlw== X-YMail-OSG: vEFmKTsVM1mYOr7ZRYH04c4at1istZjnclCSOxjzsyeBU54CTyKaeXKyEwJSWrw xz0WWfvvZ7zIrBrbBN1SZFjwdTHzipyiw1P_azfJpTpHodSqHEwy9UqSIShmHw8TAn0GDY893G6H 3kv42y7ZCWdMnZoTfWf8XjEIVLWtRgmf0m30I5cUf9SBmZpbV3iOYNsBk07pvIcT_Hbu3ODcqrR1 aLWUTy7raCWaH.efXZXVso2aC_ms8zRlOm3E_NdJKPf9dC6nKP82vS8O.uxvnkRce7LQHQedLPF4 .lNhGl_UJoTMmd36FhS6DxKhfxsBbvwzJRvqDRRtEF0KdxOq2sgf8xQBZo2lSR2ys0PDXS3.2Oxl yL9Sw2R98lYCcbmkOboz3y90W1wOwdlzIL9ZX7FFbVkYCjGnmchhnLM1IbwjMRyMBF2VaUlR1_L3 GBQscIwlmkITiuoWSrREC5q1iskSp2BMpkZtl.eu_qlpZwOW4vCShqJroXF7V0YEZX1i1W5SYE0S A2E29K36i6Fz6XuHzaEEubZsravi2TH.pr5j40wMoKKduOLHTb.6RRtX0YAsEGbVwLoby7Hr5aBq WY7q5XkM_6R.VVBh.NZCuVkuXeZbkAyhkyeKwxdgdMUMlwwwal73j6aHN4B4tEsME6ZqEEzIA9ly oHi8pS8l5v0MEmk8b5XBn7V02ORXSjMdoEmIi68HsBS7khCLL60LoJW4aIp_6U.HLs.ACe8tj7SF 4GNGuQv2y5lp6YAfuU4Moon4qc1r9FZ8snWcVi2KAyd_b7QByJ8iNDF7EHIlgdjALdFhW2q2dKxI _cxaGm3sSA5maMQ6pLFlxqVm4mJ4Ailln5OMc6gcVUu4dESvqLHdns1kxdI1XqdU2vuQtssuCu9K h9QjruEJfbXJnqVtWgninDzWRsOzm9rY1dQ8MzN7XW1p93LhiKDiYcXIfr5hjq1cvcOGYW7AbOHx _q5MZrW9rQUJx.pgmjyMMjpl3liXiD5Ff_iuKG2JUZPOmgVr33D_tWHuT9hSPCNy9ToimqaywA5Q sCPIi2XXDqsqxp_G1qfPfU0VlJo0y1YwrtJWHuY0cDapdYuwl3ur.lrfPYG5ck2KKH5SkyMb8u67 YHBzbqljeJjw21ZQJmUMGSQmhUP.TqOpT_1zmal0oORtzJgWXrZMb.AnwaaXo2kY5wZPFuExADlE L36002Ti0D35UUPh1Qj_CzkEY64Mp.FYpjDYRtUy9PsiSeAZg9CI4LGcvbh.i3dFJR6VsyvCD1uN obK_.VOxuZAVQz4XeJxqRbJseW172mybax3eE1ohwlo9KFA5lzWF6IHyRPnP0A7Sjng1twmZv9k4 q4NjLYzl7iEV8Bf9CERBtcMjxEhuXyY5iRO4GAkhasG4xr7VGj2nESv9Vs8r4z4Tf6iHSFO6Yi__ hNWs5oNPSiBrT06Q1wEMNyznC1EPS_uMD9bOzoMiljOzPunX657dtLmEbxf85QKdixUPSi8p4REd sbJyCSXJSKIO3gYUtzMEARtP61Kq05pDVSI5NKnwW0tlCKhkeJa0pGZdalUh2LWjZd5TQaXc2NxT TEdw7DPnIugoiupv_RNEBj4u9Q2xbqp1qYHS1vP6k1BupnieJZT1yDmH91VHXZdd5DvyY.n5WCkW 3qcRJK2he5xIihXC58u0oz1RWGVoKNW_devFHO9pyxhIb0AGtO8r25bMq1oHP0kEI2AWepscnaX_ jVGzEx1t7zjgfkw5QSv2bTLZc1_SdEyXEbxxHbGxmrKlOlIoCYGWV9J94ovJqBCeNHxAGgvbddUz ubcJf5V7hg9tfAHeH08ioRZp3uI2bGpfF8kutp.qOdCnNcNSw.9eKOG3ozp0ddJaLSgl_xCrRQzf VJ9UjLvkKYwcg.YWpIczyB6T1l4dlLvpHWKjKwdB_0sxdQp7oSkja3gNhpFehYYtYYQ8HiM5.No8 0XMJz_ZqWljEImaQPgL.KaGENEXvfmOq3eKSiJD.gjPOUrU2ZOpo57rAi2fJfNHar2_Gb2_LuLoc JsJK2PYPb44L4ObnKMRF_ZR9rhwpDqCPAj8iPNtxsNGUruFQ88REO5Ev84Kop_52_pyVogkFw4jD dohJ3D.svBnzUNQU_fK9yTRxHL7t78PfdTz4kbgxRwy.905YdvR7qZ6vUkz4K3f8BCNHMue.xugs lb_pfu6wRgB4dxlKa4NpMUm6NAzJaX0.6dsVgKxh6QIC_RT7gBHj8xRCca4Edrhrg7QlUP6mFzUV BbGNN5UFVEZG1y8dWjE3wqsoIYRn5WakoGUhuF6uL29Yl6Oji_b4R_3vQJsncqrS8tU78KxEG44R Qx2vASRY- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic317.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 02:15:36 +0000 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 02:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <418282920.375546.1638411045114@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <58b9b27f91944f7f398b9eef7acf2d22d8a4c9c2.camel@gmail.com> References: <1962172575.272360.1637610844717@mail.yahoo.com> <1044076368.6013516.1638103922082@mail.yahoo.com> <3b352ec6a646ae1b11f2d4fef5de0d3fc87658cf.camel@gmail.com> <1720185526.6179045.1638158480513@mail.yahoo.com> <58b9b27f91944f7f398b9eef7acf2d22d8a4c9c2.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_375545_339120671.1638411045112" X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.19306 YMailNorrin X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Jaft From: Jaft via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1638411377; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=1/g4exfI1tFcOR0yvvnS909IoilsUMKa69KBnCdpf6Q=; b=iRsDtUK9HKkKeB6ezes/1GkvHbbEGsZIElTWMFPxUaK2eSB/P46t7eh4UkKkmWg09VuLvo mtHlJfyjb1wxhJ+X8jBiPrIjl/0uNAjTAcv54l225sJipp44UUEVLx5uvb/k2nw4E2d14F iJl8clxvtQ8blTSXGBEnyCYEpdLphKdT9mju5AOFuPbJQz3MgyoVr48Phmg0aIZgm5ifU8 ADHCKQ9gZZMmRTZzahs0TQUvYEazLyAT2Nf9vwqWe9ZaJBH3rI+MZ5pf+48pt+2XEz52Cp 0w1MNlAq3PWIIVw8iOQgXA8BUglNg3RnGjELzAIYDxqlwNIc0bwZFI3GFoHCZw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1638411377; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ikuxEYv7YjZ8OppNBYEfx2YbVpeTOVXWu/80rUTw4NBnIqFtRw9MO/A/KcO347B6AGFf51 bZEztn5t/RBDSZ9RfMBffhNqrPYBMU89uD9xsEF5HIiN7EqvTRvIKnobKKrbgSJQmi2Cgd bRgMm1I+7bDKjm/f+KNTUe3IH5h62ibVgYNMLQwzCYMPoSMhSXZ1URLppfgnin0Z0YZKyW 5uGdCmwgJRTq6H8eFVyOQetWNMFnl/Uv1e14tOiFnR8h3Ft5YAxt/N0/YDtLnmUTTroF8s oGM9LsbBb52k3zwbVW1XVbAYITvj1fJf7rpfMHnwo/DFt8i9PUSOEXHPrzRiHw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=FlGnsSC+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.42 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=FlGnsSC+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B19D21051F X-Spam-Score: -3.42 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 9gHG3eNJelXg ------=_Part_375545_339120671.1638411045112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey! > On Monday, November 29, 2021, 05:20:12 AM UTC, Liliana Marie Prikler <= liliana.prikler@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Am Montag, den 29.11.2021, 04:01 +0000 schrieb Jaft: > > The issue seems to be that icons such as Papirus and Delft aren't > > using their own folders; instead, they seem to be using Adwaita's > > (maybe via the gnome-icon-theme package?). I think the images I'd > > attached better demonstrate the situation than I can, with words; > > some of the icons in the icon selection window show the right icons > > for the theme while other ones (namely the folders) default to the > > ones in the Adwaita icon theme. > >=20 > > It seems, to me, like possibly an issue with the icon themes, > > themselves? I'm not sure why it would but it's not an issue with the > > Adwaita icons, themselves; they load fine. It's the other icons which > > aren't using their full range of icons and are, instead, defaulting > > to another icon theme for some of their icons. > >=20 > > I=E2=80=A6couldn't say why (unfortunately=E2=80=A6) but it seems more t= o do with the > > other icon themes and less with the Adwaita icons, themselves. > Themes can inherit from another, i.e. default to another theme's icons > when some icon is not provided.=C2=A0 This might be a GNOME vs. XFCE thin= g, > but Delft's coloured folder icons work fine on the former.=C2=A0 You migh= t > want to check upstream whether they do in fact support XFCE.=C2=A0 It cou= ld > however also be related to the SVG situation; if those folders only > exist as SVGs and they're not supported, chances are that a fallback > will occur as well.> > > Cheers So, as soon as you mentioned this, I realized that made so much sense that = I don't know why I hadn't realized it before now. I only did a brief check but the Adwaita theme definitely uses more .pngs t= han .svgs and it seems reasonable, to me, that could be the cause. I had noticed that the core-updates-frozen branch had been merged so I upgr= aded but found things pretty much the same as before. I saw an old patch (http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D= e311ef4f87f7ad8db2114e5f89961eea0240893b) and, while I'd checked rofi for g= dk-pixbuf+svg =E2=80=93 before =E2=80=93, =E2=80=93 somehow =E2=80=93 it ma= de me think to check librsvg, this time, and found that it was using gdk-pi= xbuf, rather than gdk-pixbuf+svg. I then made a package inheriting librsvg = but using gdk-pixbuf+svg, instead, and made a package which inherited rofi = but used my librsvg package and, with that installed, rofi worked with .svg= s, then. Am I right in assuming librsvg ought to be using the latter, as the library= deals directly with handling SVGs? If so, I can put together a patch to su= bmit. =20 ------=_Part_375545_339120671.1638411045112 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey!

=20
=20
> On Monday, November 29, 2021, 05:20:12 AM UTC, Li= liana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 29.11.2021, 04:01 +0000 schrieb Jaft:
> > The issue seems to be that icons such as Papirus an= d Delft aren't
> > using their own folders; instead= , they seem to be using Adwaita's
> > (maybe via th= e gnome-icon-theme package?). I think the images I'd
>= > attached better demonstrate the situation than I can, with words;
> > some of the icons in the icon selection window sho= w the right icons
> > for the theme while other one= s (namely the folders) default to the
> > ones in t= he Adwaita icon theme.
> >
> = > It seems, to me, like possibly an issue with the icon themes,
> > themselves? I'm not sure why it would but it's not an i= ssue with the
> > Adwaita icons, themselves; they l= oad fine. It's the other icons which
> > aren't usi= ng their full range of icons and are, instead, defaulting
> > to another icon theme for some of their icons.
> >
> > I=E2=80=A6couldn't say why (unfortu= nately=E2=80=A6) but it seems more to do with the
> &g= t; other icon themes and less with the Adwaita icons, themselves.
> Themes can inherit from another, i.e. default to another the= me's icons
> when some icon is not provided.  Thi= s might be a GNOME vs. XFCE thing,
> but Delft's colou= red folder icons work fine on the former.  You might
> want to check upstream whether they do in fact support XFCE.  It= could
> however also be related to the SVG situation;= if those folders only
> exist as SVGs and they're not= supported, chances are that a fallback
> will occur a= s well.
>
>
> Cheers

So, as soon as you = mentioned this, I realized that made so much sense that I don't know why I = hadn't realized it before now.
=
I only did a brief check b= ut the Adwaita theme definitely uses more .pngs than .svgs and it seems reaso= nable, to me, that could be the cause.



I had noticed that the core-updates-frozen branch had been merged so I = upgrade<= /font>d but found things pretty much the same as before.

= I saw an old patch (http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D= e311ef4f87f7ad8db2114e5f89961eea0240893b) and, while I'd checked rofi for gdk-pixbuf= +svg =E2=80=93 before =E2=80=93, =E2=80=93 somehow =E2=80=93 it made= me think to check librsvg, this time, and found that it was using gdk-pixbuf= , rather than gdk-pixbuf+svg. I then made a package inheriting librsvg but us= ing gdk-= pixbuf+svg, instead, and made a package which inherited rofi but us= ed my li= brsvg package and, with that installed, rofi worked with .svgs, then= .

Am I right in assuming librsvg ought to be using the= latter, as the library deals directly with handling SVGs? If so, I can put= together a patch to submit.
------=_Part_375545_339120671.1638411045112--