On 05-10-2022 19:58, Frank Pursel wrote: > Performed another 'guix pull' to receive one more change which led to > the additional reporting: > > guile-ssh-0.15.1-debug 238KiB 227.0MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% > Backtrace:: > 15 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/k76q0ikk8a7769b0d2b9y3jj2mpaywh0-compute-guix-derivation") > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 155:9 14 (_ _) > 159:9 13 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(# ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?)) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 152:2 12 (with-fluid* _ _ _) > 152:2 11 (with-fluid* _ _ _) > In ./guix/store.scm: > 2165:24 10 (run-with-store # # ?) > 1993:8 9 (_ #) > In ./guix/gexp.scm: > 300:22 8 (_ #) > 1181:2 7 (_ #) > 1047:2 6 (_ #) > 893:4 5 (_ #) > In ./guix/store.scm: > 2050:12 4 (_ #) > 1402:13 3 (map/accumulate-builds # # ?) > 1398:5 2 (map/accumulate-builds # # ?) > 1414:15 1 (_ # ("/gnu/store/063db2n6gr2pqvy77fxp82p0ki6vwklz-guile-avah?" ?) ?) > 1414:15 0 (loop #f) > Looks like a duplicate of the second part of , (*), , and . (*) I think this one is interesting, as it seems to indicate that build errors of packages aren't handled during "guix pull" -- there is a patch available for that, though not applied yet IIRC. Greetings, Maxime.