From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Castillo Subject: bug#23274: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:28:58 +0100 Message-ID: <337b943b-56a1-f863-104e-8b309b18fb5d@uni-bremen.de> References: <20160412012237.GA24435@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GebDaU8TU4JqMD82oVFG9GLBs6XIuX3ug" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55143) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNh4o-00081k-GX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:30:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNh4k-0004Qw-IJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:30:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNh4k-0004Ps-9m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:30:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNh4k-0002ac-2b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:30:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160412012237.GA24435@jasmine> Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 23274@debbugs.gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --GebDaU8TU4JqMD82oVFG9GLBs6XIuX3ug Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="9DV4UnXFHw4X6Uf59XwxLqB5k7QH33e4F"; protected-headers="v1" From: Martin Castillo To: 23274@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <337b943b-56a1-f863-104e-8b309b18fb5d@uni-bremen.de> Subject: Re: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user --9DV4UnXFHw4X6Uf59XwxLqB5k7QH33e4F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =E2=80=9CAddress already in use=E2=80=9D makes me directly think that the= re is already another daemon running. Strangely, starting another daemon as root works. It seems to take the socket from the other daemon away. Is this intended? Or can two daemons run in parallel without problems? What is your use case? Do you want to run the daemon us unprivileged user or did you forget to add sudo? Martin --=20 GPG: 7FDE 7190 2F73 2C50 236E 403D CC13 48F1 E644 08EC --9DV4UnXFHw4X6Uf59XwxLqB5k7QH33e4F-- --GebDaU8TU4JqMD82oVFG9GLBs6XIuX3ug Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE61CTslYA+K5btSvb61vedmKoYVkFAlosATsACgkQ61vedmKo YVlsrwgAiSbPdMDvTcFasDANfeWWH9Xv065pxcFdPuj4Z53JC0lf7DVjoIUIteed iVEzU4+4c7IKKpqzj4BVuQK5f+YmuTJnq2nLB71sJwc77UC84Ji02gDA5jpnCjo9 +69NS8x+DbDe34+6K3QDK/JXBQ0HpJMCDRFBnP5g6l2VSEr/zmn/ebzSiushAxaC jmy1zq1OY3Xwn2jXVYfSNV8BY/rgZ9zjrtbgo/GeR5HtbWMWn3cEXKjg6/vG3DUk xwpYxn82rfy7QlP+3wfQFdmF6OLPNY4thWQlnG/IsevCRATLvkb/lmqEGvZcDNUN Hl9JXs0iurOdtblWp8xCnzHw2oUlzg== =nzNl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GebDaU8TU4JqMD82oVFG9GLBs6XIuX3ug--