unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: 40558@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#40558: (no subject)
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:57:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2O0C65TN1X0RC.2X8CEIYC1SBBG@wilsonb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8736203agz.fsf@elephly.net>

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
> This is a problem with the modular TeX Live packages.  The pk files are
> bitmap fonts.  I found that adding texlive-cm-super to the union helps
> in that the bitmap variants of the CM fonts will not be generated any
> more.  More font packages may be needed in the union to prevent TeX from
> falling back to bitmap fonts in other cases.
> 
> In any case, that’s unrelated to Jelle’s patch, which looks fine to me.

Thank you, Ricardo, for looking into this.

I have lost signficant amounts of hair trying to find a solution. Adding
texlive-cm-super doesn't help for the document I trying to typeset. In fact, I
even grabbed all texlive packages with fonts and threw them in the
texlive-union to no effect. No matter what, pdflatex bails when trying to find
the font to set $~$.

The only way I have gotten it to typeset under a texlive-union so far is by
munging texlive-amsfonts as Jelle mentioned.




  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-03  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-11 16:15 bug#40558: Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts Jelle Licht
2020-04-20 19:31 ` Jelle Licht
2022-02-11 19:39   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2020-05-09 10:47 ` bug#40558: (no subject) elaexuotee
2020-05-12 12:36   ` Jelle Licht
2020-10-26 22:10   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-02-03  9:57     ` elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix [this message]
2022-01-21 17:21       ` bug#40558: Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts Ricardo Wurmus
2022-01-21 23:42         ` elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-01-22  7:50           ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-01-23  2:53             ` elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-01-23 10:55               ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-11 14:58         ` zimoun
2022-02-15 16:34 ` Ricardo Wurmus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2O0C65TN1X0RC.2X8CEIYC1SBBG@wilsonb.com \
    --to=bug-guix@gnu.org \
    --cc=40558@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=elaexuotee@wilsonb.com \
    --cc=rekado@elephly.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).