From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2A2rMpvDLl+tPgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 15:24:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id AF59LpvDLl9UGAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 15:24:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5500194062F for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 15:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37262 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4Qhd-0006m7-Nc for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:24:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4QhW-0006lw-RI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:24:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4QhW-0006OA-IT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4QhW-00052E-Ar for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#42759: Flint license is wrong Resent-From: Max Horn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 15:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42759 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Received: via spool by 42759-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42759.159690019819306 (code B ref 42759); Sat, 08 Aug 2020 15:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 42759) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2020 15:23:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59488 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4Qgn-00051K-Sl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:23:18 -0400 Received: from wp256.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.133.25]:44210) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4Qgk-000519-8i for 42759@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:23:16 -0400 Received: from dslb-084-059-126-085.084.059.pools.vodafone-ip.de ([84.59.126.85] helo=[192.168.178.67]); authenticated by wp256.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1k4Qgg-0002Xi-LR; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 17:23:10 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Max Horn Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2020 17:23:10 +0200 Message-Id: <2EA056B4-B4E9-4260-9B70-134A4209A574@quendi.de> References: <87imdtmbjj.fsf@nckx> In-Reply-To: <87imdtmbjj.fsf@nckx> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17G68) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;max@quendi.de;1596900194;9f46bc02; X-HE-SMSGID: 1k4Qgg-0002Xi-LR X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 42759@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.99 X-TUID: NQHurwt9rzSM Hi, > Am 08.08.2020 um 16:56 schrieb Tobias Geerinckx-Rice : >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHullo Max, >=20 > Max Horn =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> The license of the "flint" package is currently set to gpl2+ but it reall= y is lgpl2.1+ >=20 > Could you elaborate? How did you test this? What, that the license is lgpl2.1+ ? That's what the website states (right a= t the top of the front page), along with an explanation that the license cha= nged from 2.5 to 2.6. It is also what the README and the LICENSE files state= . So it looks to me as if whoever updated the package from 2.5.2 to 2.6.0 did n= ot pay attention and missed the license change. >=20 >> Also, there was a bugfix release 2.6. which you might want to update to. >=20 > Done, thanks! Great! Cheers Max >=20 > Kind regards, >=20 > T G-R