unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux
@ 2021-07-17  0:04 Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
  2021-07-17  0:20 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
  2021-09-01  2:02 ` Sam James
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2021-07-17  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 49600

Hello,

On core-updates (at least as of commit 8456581375cf), the gcc package fails 
to cross-compile. This can be seen in the following CI jobs:

• https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667365/details
  gcc-11.1.0, arm-linux-gnueabihf.gcc.x86_64-linux
• https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667394/details
  gcc-11.1.0, aarch64-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux
• https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667452/details
  gcc-11.1.0, powerpc64le-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux
• https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667481/details
  gcc-11.1.0, riscv64-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux
• https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667336/details
  gcc-11.1.0, mips64el-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux
• https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667423/details
  gcc-11.1.0, powerpc-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux

They all fail with a similar error:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
    ⋮
In file included from /tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/move.h:57,
                 from /tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/nested_exception.h:40,
                 from ../../../../gcc-11.1.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/exception:148,
                 from ../../../../gcc-11.1.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_exception.cc:26:
/tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits:971:25: error: there are no arguments to ?__is_nothrow_constructible? that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ?__is_nothrow_constructible? must be available [-fpermissive]
  971 |       = __bool_constant<__is_nothrow_constructible(_Tp, _Args...)>;
      |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits:971:25: note: (if you use ?-fpermissive?, G++ will accept your code, but allowing the use of an undeclared name is deprecated)
/tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits:971:66: error: template argument 1 is invalid
  971 |       = __bool_constant<__is_nothrow_constructible(_Tp, _Args...)>;
      |                                                                  ^
/tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits:976:45: error: expected template-name before ?<? token
  976 |     : public __is_nothrow_constructible_impl<_Tp, _Args...>::type
      |                                             ^
/tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits:976:45: error: expected ?{? before ?<? token
    ⋮
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

In addition to that, arm-linux-gnueabihf.gcc.x86_64-linux has the following
error which doesn’t appear on the other arches:

no include path in which to search for stdc-predef.h

As a side note, gcc-11.1.0 also fails to build on
i586-pc-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux¹, but with a very different error message,
so it appears to be an unrelated problem.

gcc-8.5.0 also fails to cross-compile on several arches, but with a
different error message as well, so it also appears to be a separate
problem.

-- 
Thanks,
Thiago

¹ https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667510/details






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux
  2021-07-17  0:04 bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
@ 2021-07-17  0:20 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
  2021-09-01  2:02 ` Sam James
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2021-07-17  0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 49600

Hi,

There were several commits added to GCC’s ‘releases/gcc-11’ branch since 
the 11.1.0 release, so I wanted to check whether this problem was fixed by 
any of them.

I applied the patch containing those commits to the gcc-11 package, 
obtained by running the following on a git checkout of the GCC repo:

```
$ git diff releases/gcc-11.1.0..origin/releases/gcc-11 \
	> gcc-11-branch-update.patch
```

At the time, origin/releases/gcc-11 was:

419201f566bb libstdc++: Use function object for __decay_copy helper

Unfortunately it didn’t make a difference.

-- 
Thanks,
Thiago






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux
  2021-07-17  0:04 bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
  2021-07-17  0:20 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
@ 2021-09-01  2:02 ` Sam James
  2021-11-26 19:07   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sam James @ 2021-09-01  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 49600

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 131 bytes --]

Seem to have hit the same thing in Gentoo (reported as https://bugs.gentoo.org/811294).

Has Guix found a workaround since?



[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 618 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux
  2021-09-01  2:02 ` Sam James
@ 2021-11-26 19:07   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2021-11-26 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sam James; +Cc: 49600

Hello Sam,

Sorry, I missed your message when you sent it originally and just found it 
now.

Em terça-feira, 31 de agosto de 2021, às 23:02:04 -03, Sam James escreveu:
> Seem to have hit the same thing in Gentoo (reported as
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/811294).
> 
> Has Guix found a workaround since?

No, our cross gcc-11 builds are still hitting this issue. E.g.:

aarch64-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1750690/details 

powerpc64le-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1750748/details

riscv64-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1750777/details

Though I haven’t worked on this issue since I last reported on it.

-- 
Thanks,
Thiago






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-26 19:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-17  0:04 bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-07-17  0:20 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-09-01  2:02 ` Sam James
2021-11-26 19:07   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).