From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KAWCAGzOul4LcwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:27:24 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 0PqGF3rOul4eewAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:27:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A818B94104A for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48674 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXkm-0002vj-A2 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:27:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXkF-0002UC-8L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:27:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXkD-0003ZY-OQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXkD-0006kk-LH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:27:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#40549: proposal for 'process-actions' Resent-From: Tom Zander Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 16:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40549 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 40549@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 40549-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40549.158930079025918 (code B ref 40549); Tue, 12 May 2020 16:27:01 +0000 Received: (at 40549) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2020 16:26:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56397 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXji-0006jx-7n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:26:30 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.42]:62114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYXjg-0006jj-SM for 40549@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:26:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D97E9FC; Tue, 12 May 2020 18:26:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freedommail.ch; h=content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received:received; s= dkim20160331; t=1589300782; x=1591115183; bh=PwTCfacKVy8prSvlS10 swCulu60doj6oG7FsFPCe7ig=; b=OCYvFkoXO/A18CNxaqX92t8h7KpSJ+cGKtv ZtyikF16vjjhCAjGUKvqwTuhUiOOUelMrxK9EalnoGl9y7d14DS/HWdFt1Gz9/wQ OvbDm/9b88PC83wj+c5DK5ORXwk/OOJPlyMMUT1CZlauYhLZS/jICZW/FsW5PaF/ N3jOl25XGGcEbX2ue9vqquNwx/2TfG/Ewhnag66GPCyzefaEMdJvk6L7FssBi/MM VEvDLT5/ENXTY24hdBTY3JJBvCJzQ+jSa1YeLTTKY2MuulJ3YB1WTOOv9Zfg4pmg bBwIRJySXnb6qpFdOOAixayOkHbDDbtrG8uLh8w5GIEFEmZCw0NDY+XDxGlhHXQZ aTa7g1U0mB5JxKpDxnF+6CFciQaC+5+F/DoGZzN41cJK7m1XVoUc1RfABZOQippV ama9WqLAoLjCpQfupLRbx3/0p0cv6xC0K0d2LcOdIQGn1eQzCj1wV8KkzRfem2Kx GhweHAGFjyPH98FBvGLBLqQMgzjPWH9cvXbZjrEqkl/SuUhtvc1pRVrGPUbW45+B GQE5EKjaM+R5eZpdUxVRwAwp47pt/OrzflLM1nDNAIg4kC1z0G4nyjMnZhpPgjYR CWmkbHxMpYrL3PCcJ4RmvIPsdvENqDSEzqrYjpNxA+abX4t30G7dYkuxVIWvEEL5 5Xlln1t4= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Score: -1.9 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ha9YUL3g0UH9; Tue, 12 May 2020 18:26:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.3]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C238D40C; Tue, 12 May 2020 18:26:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm001.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.1]) by int-mx003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B621B55; Tue, 12 May 2020 18:26:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:26:20 +0200 Message-ID: <2468105.Lt9SDvczpP@cherry> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Tom Zander From: Tom Zander via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.99 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=freedommail.ch header.s=dkim20160331 header.b=OCYvFkoX; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.99 / 13.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[tomz@freedommail.ch]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.53992611030572]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[freedommail.ch:s=dkim20160331]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[209.51.188.17:server fail]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.06), country: US(-0.00), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.54)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[freedommail.ch:-]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[debbugs.gnu.org,gmail.com]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bug-guix@gnu.org,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gnu.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[11]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: 54Q+uyjK0gdg On dinsdag 12 mei 2020 15:03:14 CEST zimoun wrote: > If yes, I can come up with a patch. I think that would be much improved, yes. -- Tom Zander