From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manolis Ragkousis Subject: bug#40006: `guix build hello' now succeeds on the Hurd Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:04:16 +0200 Message-ID: <232f0c23-49f4-1705-da4a-5a35e8ad12a9@gmail.com> References: <878skd94d4.fsf@gnu.org> <87imjdzc76.fsf@gnu.org> <87a74o4mcp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBgRM-0007H7-3F for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:05:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBgRK-0007w6-Iv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:05:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBgRK-0007vQ-E4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:05:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBgRK-00027b-5P for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:05:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87a74o4mcp.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 40006@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Jan, First of all awesome work!! On 3/10/20 10:59 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > I briefly looked at more work-in-progress daemon patches by Manolis, but > stopped when I found that it needs [t]his "new" libhurdutils library... > @Manolis? > This is that work https://github.com/Phant0mas/Hurd/commit/3501ee22ad4150b3b2cf9a386d2350b9a68aecd8.patch It was working, needed some cleanup but it never got merged. What is does is implement mount and bind mounts using the hurd firmlinks. >> Merging what you haveā€”the earlier the better. :-) >>> Shall I push this to savannah as `wip-hurd' (possibly save wip-hurd-> >>> `wip-hurd-old?); I don't think we need to keep the old wip-hurd. Just get rid of it. Manolis