From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id yFyAKKs6CmeqOQAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:00:27 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id yFyAKKs6CmeqOQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:00:27 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=UI+XasBG; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=icloud.com header.s=1a1hai header.b=Y+re3EZf; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1728723627; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=YpeRTE2xCpX2Ku1NkwoyoY7HxZwsjEreQ4UQyA7CqxI=; b=alWd8H7CyXssLeNPboQ58sld8LtK2T8tc64K6OID+HHeQNJiFRrrQftEFhvCCcHgJYih9Q f7C1I79sX0wriL0X7vEltD6LaW2Yo+Nd/oTEXeZmh4khsniqLoXKY3zE/c5rXh4ia32lpu DCvnOD3KHTgtxucL9+sDrvJRMQ3LVm/8mgkMa1E3amPhVd1MoJLOYUnPlzVzzTu4UWAX6v CVhLzPQq6lcaM+swkEryYDhqIG/98Eqns/1C9M1P5V6wfSOt7yDrX+IOjqZQZv5JqNGiyr otXtHC9KQ0JILMt6jJ3SQyd3No/ssN6gnzKQ37y1iToIFUULGqqGeNyb29GEpA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1728723627; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aZ0b9C06fkkizFXVAtcdjt2xz3WEuOpsVMRkKQ/Z6eui9aGtpTL9kpUm1d81LnB1ECLAEo TnWywmxH2fei3vOd2kjsNv2iGqpNVRJ0TGVuc5kZqRWnkmpe02+3s4LstdD1VB9xLZgboM OcftTf/gpeC59YVfqCbcYI44tuc+1H4aRIDAVmQwipVHZElmMKP43Q0tDXzaXeJ2fFQWge gy1FgOSIduwd4DU7KzX5M49m5e54865xDJQ+0o469KU7myVCH6yaODIsT1/geCH26mmxCJ ihLZCwBjvU/5ztWAXFfFeUbkqT1xloUzk+hePQYjJ4TQqw6ztcXRSI0mF3EVHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=UI+XasBG; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=icloud.com header.s=1a1hai header.b=Y+re3EZf; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB403ACA for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:00:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szXyW-0003Dz-UR; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:59:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1syWEK-0000H2-Um for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 08:55:53 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1syWEK-0007nq-M1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 08:55:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject; bh=YpeRTE2xCpX2Ku1NkwoyoY7HxZwsjEreQ4UQyA7CqxI=; b=UI+XasBGnu0mLAozdFb0tfNMvX7A34RF4DYJxEDUn766OP86W/cIVSV88kkQY9LShofMZ2/O2YD9PTsNgWp6bupozLYS1PAg49sdwyZsnmA9F6U7PabwAOVuBU93qj+p3Bwff+SXsfacI1lx2S3+ZRIi9siQsCo/Ak6nAzuPFiz9Pp9WXEG4zFCl9e4QUaLo5vRh35sxbS/nFExk3Bk2drpHeciZH0lbA2/wJXaokMQdaqVCxqeIZdNFjyC8o9pyThjOmcj9nmX/dWA4I+lxg41EXAfexKVUXZIsUCdxgcii1S8t2Z1K8ye6EnPJKM/2lB8I8Ls39MUBR0WoXHZ67w==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1syWEU-0005qB-J3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 08:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#73645: I concur References: <2vyBYBP9p3NAhbOu0hNOhi0M34N0Ot2c7lbNV68TcX6Yoyqb9Nmgt_64AcB-D2T7_zGboBhT57E5pyOqlTuReJbp3HoYeWNXUyjxutpxWxo=@proton.me> In-Reply-To: <2vyBYBP9p3NAhbOu0hNOhi0M34N0Ot2c7lbNV68TcX6Yoyqb9Nmgt_64AcB-D2T7_zGboBhT57E5pyOqlTuReJbp3HoYeWNXUyjxutpxWxo=@proton.me> Resent-From: Andrew Wong Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 12:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73645 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 73645@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73645-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73645.172847855422432 (code B ref 73645); Wed, 09 Oct 2024 12:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 73645) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2024 12:55:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55977 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1syWEI-0005pd-DA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 08:55:54 -0400 Received: from qs51p00im-qukt01080501.me.com ([17.57.155.22]:57919) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1syWB4-0005bT-Dt for 73645@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 08:52:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1728478334; bh=YpeRTE2xCpX2Ku1NkwoyoY7HxZwsjEreQ4UQyA7CqxI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y+re3EZfwQ+/GGggx8jdb1tgmkBXCDcNuWmpvGXT1VyKW3fNfebkaM60XG//bU2Jk luFbnQ4EvdB8mo3D3hFvh9oNYoyB6pF2f7SfZ994+7az4fiXKS84TnGKfiayjAN2ox aMyr21+IMH0qm/aIzw2dzoVKy1ZRuCWPO4bubaFnX7VVnHFVDnftBawh3sKX0QsZIB O0sWGMpI4Q93Bf7yZglbKxW/ESQnfhHvh7lFl1758wG1UIVDGAUjHB+9tOnOyFlop8 P6k1LmXxVVO2QqKhQFi5dqBVvWgEqMO+0bnejLGK6qo6xxNLcprJ3JHm+Wv6xWsURP xAGvuOo5SqOpg== Received: from localhost (qs51p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com [17.57.155.28]) by qs51p00im-qukt01080501.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A69E1980223 for <73645@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 08:52:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20241009085211.332eefe5@icloud.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-GUID: MtR6cBohkqR7AtvflZHmVamS4KeP0ml7 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: MtR6cBohkqR7AtvflZHmVamS4KeP0ml7 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-09_09,2024-10-09_02,2024-09-30_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=323 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2410090083 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 08:55:49 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:59:46 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Andrew Wong From: Andrew Wong via Bug reports for GNU Guix Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.32 X-Spam-Score: -2.32 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7DB403ACA X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: 2FOe6WnjEpFK Chiming in to say I am also experiencing this. I don't think it's appropriate to close this however, as if this *is* caused by https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/issues/152, then this is a bug which has been present for three years now and can't be relied on to go away anytime soon. There must be some workaround that can be implemented--perhaps some fiddling with the "check" phase in the package definition to skip the faulty test would do it (though I haven't fully examined the consequences of such a thing) p.s. please avoid quoting the entire email you are replying to.