bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

[Dariqq]

Hi,

Upgraded my old i686 machine to after core updates merge 
(b8327cb31199fb9f4ebed6c53a59601d41def5a1) and now earlier versions of 
ffmpeg fail to build.


phase `patch-source-shebangs' succeeded after 0.6 seconds
starting phase `bypass-openal-check'
phase `bypass-openal-check' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `configure'
ERROR: openal not found



I can't find the "alGetError ||" string in the configure script which is 
used to bypass the check on ffmepg@6 in the earlier versions (#72838).

bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

[Dariqq]

I was able to reconfigure the system on core updates by adding the 
following snippet into openals phases

#$@(if (target-x86-32?)
  #~((add-before 'configure 'unprotect
      (lambda* _
        (substitute* "CMakeLists.txt"
          (("if\\(HAVE_GCC_PROTECTED_VISIBILITY\\)") "if(0)")))))
  #~())

which disables the protection causing problems. I don't know what the 
implications of this change are.

bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

[André Batista]

dom 01 set 2024 às 12:15:01 (1725203701), dariqq@posteo.net enviou:
> I was able to reconfigure the system on core updates by adding the following
> snippet into openals phases
> 
> #$@(if (target-x86-32?)
>  #~((add-before 'configure 'unprotect
>      (lambda* _
>        (substitute* "CMakeLists.txt"
>          (("if\\(HAVE_GCC_PROTECTED_VISIBILITY\\)") "if(0)")))))
>  #~())
> 
> which disables the protection causing problems. I don't know what the
> implications of this change are.

The problem with this solution is twofold: first we would loose this
safety check for all packages that depend on openal and even for devs on
guix working with this library; second, since there are many packages
which use it as an input, this would trigger lots os rebuilds.

I think the reasons why this was implemented were described here:

<https://maskray.me/blog/2021-01-09-copy-relocations-canonical-plt-entries-and-protected>

Cheers!

bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

[André Batista]

Hi Dariqq,

sáb 31 ago 2024 às 15:46:01 (1725129961), dariqq@posteo.net enviou:
> Hi,
> 
> Upgraded my old i686 machine to after core updates merge
> (b8327cb31199fb9f4ebed6c53a59601d41def5a1) and now earlier versions of
> ffmpeg fail to build.
> 
> phase `patch-source-shebangs' succeeded after 0.6 seconds
> starting phase `bypass-openal-check'
> phase `bypass-openal-check' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `configure'
> ERROR: openal not found
> 
> I can't find the "alGetError ||" string in the configure script which is
> used to bypass the check on ffmepg@6 in the earlier versions (#72838).
> 

I'm sorry for that, I should've checked that this string would match on
earlier versions of ffmpeg. Looking back, replacing the 'die' clause
would make more sense. However, since changing it now would trigger
many rebuilds, I'll send a patch which changes the match only for the
broken earlier versions.

Thanks for reporting and feel free to CC me if/when you see that a patch
of mine has been incomplete or otherwise has caused issues.

bug#72917: [PATCH] gnu: ffmpeg-{5, 4, 3}: Fix build on i686 with binutils 2.41.

[André Batista]

Fixes <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72917>.

* gnu/packages/video.scm (ffmpeg-5): Replace 'bypass-openal-check
string substitution with one that matches on this and earlier
versions of ffmpeg.
(ffmpeg-4): Inherit package arguments from ffmpeg-5.

Reported-by: Dariqq <dariqq@posteo.net>

Change-Id: Ie5b51a174be45b511757dece369563975e498bac
---
 gnu/packages/video.scm | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/video.scm b/gnu/packages/video.scm
index ac9fabeb38..8b4da65836 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/video.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/video.scm
@@ -1845,6 +1845,9 @@ (define-public ffmpeg
                       ;; https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-08/msg00159.html
                       (lambda _
                         (substitute* "configure"
+                          ;; This string only matches on ffmpeg v6 and above.
+                          ;; Replace it with the one defined at ffmpeg-5 which
+                          ;; matches on all ffmpeg versions. See #71917.
                           (("alGetError \\|\\|")
                            "alGetError \|\| true \|\|")))))
                  #~())
@@ -1889,7 +1892,18 @@ (define-public ffmpeg-5
                                   version ".tar.xz"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "0qwhyhil805hns7yksdxagnrcc90h60al7lz1rc65kd1j2w3nf2l"))))))
+                "0qwhyhil805hns7yksdxagnrcc90h60al7lz1rc65kd1j2w3nf2l"))))
+    (arguments
+     (if (target-x86-32?)
+         (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments ffmpeg)
+           ((#:phases phases)
+            #~(modify-phases #$phases
+                (replace 'bypass-openal-check
+                  (lambda _
+                    (substitute* "configure"
+                      (("die \"ERROR: openal not found\"")
+                       "true")))))))
+         (package-arguments ffmpeg)))))
 
 (define-public ffmpeg-4
   (package
@@ -1907,7 +1921,7 @@ (define-public ffmpeg-4
     (inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs ffmpeg)
               (replace "sdl2" sdl2-2.0)))
     (arguments
-     (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments ffmpeg)
+     (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments ffmpeg-5)
        ((#:configure-flags flags ''())
         #~(cons "--enable-avresample" #$flags))))))
 

base-commit: 778dd796bff808f1f8520533bab239ecbe83cd87
-- 
2.45.2

bug#72917: [PATCH] gnu: ffmpeg-{5, 4, 3}: Fix build on i686 with binutils 2.41.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi André,

André Batista <nandre@riseup.net> skribis:

> Fixes <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72917>.
>
> * gnu/packages/video.scm (ffmpeg-5): Replace 'bypass-openal-check
> string substitution with one that matches on this and earlier
> versions of ffmpeg.
> (ffmpeg-4): Inherit package arguments from ffmpeg-5.
>
> Reported-by: Dariqq <dariqq@posteo.net>
>
> Change-Id: Ie5b51a174be45b511757dece369563975e498bac

Applied, thanks!  And thank you Dariqq for reporting the issue and
testing the patch.

Ludo’.

bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

André Batista <nandre@riseup.net> skribis:

> Fixes <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72917>.
>
> * gnu/packages/video.scm (ffmpeg-5): Replace 'bypass-openal-check
> string substitution with one that matches on this and earlier
> versions of ffmpeg.
> (ffmpeg-4): Inherit package arguments from ffmpeg-5.
>
> Reported-by: Dariqq <dariqq@posteo.net>
>
> Change-Id: Ie5b51a174be45b511757dece369563975e498bac

As it turns out, while all 3 variants built fine for i686 on a machine
of mine, there are test failures at ci.guix:

From <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5613329/details>:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--- ./tests/ref/fate/filter-lavd-scalenorm	2023-11-09 23:38:51.000000000 +0000
+++ tests/data/fate/filter-lavd-scalenorm	2024-09-04 17:57:08.701821746 +0000
@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-#tb 0: 1/5
-#media_type 0: video
-#codec_id 0: rawvideo
-#dimensions 0: 128x96
-#sar 0: 1/1
-0,          0,          0,        1,    18432, 0xac484db5
-0,          1,          1,        1,    18432, 0x94734db6
-0,          2,          2,        1,    18432, 0x3fac4db3
-0,          3,          3,        1,    18432, 0x37a94dcd
-0,          4,          4,        1,    18432, 0x2b3e4dbb
-0,          5,          5,        1,    18432, 0xd23a67bf
-0,          6,          6,        1,    18432, 0x898368e1
-0,          7,          7,        1,    18432, 0x79466438
-0,          8,          8,        1,    18432, 0x458c5d95
-0,          9,          9,        1,    18432, 0x9d9a56ee
Test filter-lavd-scalenorm failed. Look at tests/data/fate/filter-lavd-scalenorm.err for details.
make: *** [tests/Makefile:304: fate-filter-lavd-scalenorm] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
TEST    filter-refcmp-psnr-rgb

Test suite failed, dumping logs.
error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("fate" "-j" "24") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> 
phase `check' failed after 8.7 seconds
command "make" "fate" "-j" "24" failed with status 2
build process 18 exited with status 256
builder for `/gnu/store/7wsa154li4w974z2p6qnaaw97ng9m8hq-ffmpeg-5.1.4.drv' failed with exit code 1
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

And from <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5613330/details>:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--- ./tests/ref/lavf/fits	1970-01-01 00:00:01.000000000 +0000
+++ tests/data/fate/lavf-fits	2024-09-04 17:57:17.900035764 +0000
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 ed9fd697d0d782df6201f6a2db184552 *./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
 5328000 ./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
-./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xbacf446c
+./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xeb450e41
 48e6caf6a59e32f9a8a39979c9183a7f *./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
 10368000 ./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
-./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xae2b58d4
+./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xcc6d0df7
 be2f7112fd193c9a909304c81e662769 *./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
 15408000 ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
 ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits CRC=0x04ed3828
TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv422p
TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv444p
Test lavf-fits failed. Look at tests/data/fate/lavf-fits.err for details.
make: *** [tests/Makefile:226: fate-lavf-fits] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Test suite failed, dumping logs.
error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("fate" "-j" "24") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> 
phase `check' failed after 17.3 seconds
command "make" "fate" "-j" "24" failed with status 2
build process 18 exited with status 256
builder for `/gnu/store/90fv07zbjc92dscaj42c2yzrqpl1qlza-ffmpeg-3.4.13.drv' failed with exit code 1
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Are you seeing this?  Does the Internet have something to say about
these?

Thanks,
Ludo’.

bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

[Dariqq]

Hi,

On 05.09.24 09:25, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,

> 
> As it turns out, while all 3 variants built fine for i686 on a machine
> of mine, there are test failures at ci.guix:
> 
>  From <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5613329/details>:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> --- ./tests/ref/fate/filter-lavd-scalenorm	2023-11-09 23:38:51.000000000 +0000
> +++ tests/data/fate/filter-lavd-scalenorm	2024-09-04 17:57:08.701821746 +0000
> @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
> -#tb 0: 1/5
> -#media_type 0: video
> -#codec_id 0: rawvideo
> -#dimensions 0: 128x96
> -#sar 0: 1/1
> -0,          0,          0,        1,    18432, 0xac484db5
> -0,          1,          1,        1,    18432, 0x94734db6
> -0,          2,          2,        1,    18432, 0x3fac4db3
> -0,          3,          3,        1,    18432, 0x37a94dcd
> -0,          4,          4,        1,    18432, 0x2b3e4dbb
> -0,          5,          5,        1,    18432, 0xd23a67bf
> -0,          6,          6,        1,    18432, 0x898368e1
> -0,          7,          7,        1,    18432, 0x79466438
> -0,          8,          8,        1,    18432, 0x458c5d95
> -0,          9,          9,        1,    18432, 0x9d9a56ee
> Test filter-lavd-scalenorm failed. Look at tests/data/fate/filter-lavd-scalenorm.err for details.
> make: *** [tests/Makefile:304: fate-filter-lavd-scalenorm] Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> TEST    filter-refcmp-psnr-rgb
> 
> Test suite failed, dumping logs.
> error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
> %exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("fate" "-j" "24") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f>
> phase `check' failed after 8.7 seconds
> command "make" "fate" "-j" "24" failed with status 2
> build process 18 exited with status 256
> builder for `/gnu/store/7wsa154li4w974z2p6qnaaw97ng9m8hq-ffmpeg-5.1.4.drv' failed with exit code 1
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> And from <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5613330/details>:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> --- ./tests/ref/lavf/fits	1970-01-01 00:00:01.000000000 +0000
> +++ tests/data/fate/lavf-fits	2024-09-04 17:57:17.900035764 +0000
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
>   ed9fd697d0d782df6201f6a2db184552 *./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
>   5328000 ./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
> -./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xbacf446c
> +./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xeb450e41
>   48e6caf6a59e32f9a8a39979c9183a7f *./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
>   10368000 ./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
> -./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xae2b58d4
> +./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xcc6d0df7
>   be2f7112fd193c9a909304c81e662769 *./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
>   15408000 ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
>   ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits CRC=0x04ed3828
> TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv422p
> TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv444p
> Test lavf-fits failed. Look at tests/data/fate/lavf-fits.err for details.
> make: *** [tests/Makefile:226: fate-lavf-fits] Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> 
> Test suite failed, dumping logs.
> error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
> %exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("fate" "-j" "24") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f>
> phase `check' failed after 17.3 seconds
> command "make" "fate" "-j" "24" failed with status 2
> build process 18 exited with status 256
> builder for `/gnu/store/90fv07zbjc92dscaj42c2yzrqpl1qlza-ffmpeg-3.4.13.drv' failed with exit code 1
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> Are you seeing this?  Does the Internet have something to say about
> these?
> 

ffmpeg@5 builds without issues for me. For ffmpeg@3 the tests always 
fail at the lavf-fits tests same as the ci system.

For ffmpeg@4 which has by far the most dependants (including things like 
webkitgtk etc) i have no test issues.

> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

I hope this helps,
Dariqq

bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

[André Batista]

Hi,

qui 05 set 2024 às 09:25:36 (1725539136), ludo@gnu.org enviou:
> Hello,
> 
> As it turns out, while all 3 variants built fine for i686 on a machine
> of mine, there are test failures at ci.guix:
> 
> From <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5613329/details>:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> --- ./tests/ref/fate/filter-lavd-scalenorm	2023-11-09 23:38:51.000000000 +0000
> +++ tests/data/fate/filter-lavd-scalenorm	2024-09-04 17:57:08.701821746 +0000
> @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
> -#tb 0: 1/5
> -#media_type 0: video
> -#codec_id 0: rawvideo
> -#dimensions 0: 128x96
> -#sar 0: 1/1
> -0,          0,          0,        1,    18432, 0xac484db5
> -0,          1,          1,        1,    18432, 0x94734db6
> -0,          2,          2,        1,    18432, 0x3fac4db3
> -0,          3,          3,        1,    18432, 0x37a94dcd
> -0,          4,          4,        1,    18432, 0x2b3e4dbb
> -0,          5,          5,        1,    18432, 0xd23a67bf
> -0,          6,          6,        1,    18432, 0x898368e1
> -0,          7,          7,        1,    18432, 0x79466438
> -0,          8,          8,        1,    18432, 0x458c5d95
> -0,          9,          9,        1,    18432, 0x9d9a56ee
> Test filter-lavd-scalenorm failed. Look at tests/data/fate/filter-lavd-scalenorm.err for details.
> make: *** [tests/Makefile:304: fate-filter-lavd-scalenorm] Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> TEST    filter-refcmp-psnr-rgb
> 
> Test suite failed, dumping logs.
> error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
> %exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("fate" "-j" "24") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> 
> phase `check' failed after 8.7 seconds
> command "make" "fate" "-j" "24" failed with status 2
> build process 18 exited with status 256
> builder for `/gnu/store/7wsa154li4w974z2p6qnaaw97ng9m8hq-ffmpeg-5.1.4.drv' failed with exit code 1
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> And from <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5613330/details>:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> --- ./tests/ref/lavf/fits	1970-01-01 00:00:01.000000000 +0000
> +++ tests/data/fate/lavf-fits	2024-09-04 17:57:17.900035764 +0000
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
>  ed9fd697d0d782df6201f6a2db184552 *./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
>  5328000 ./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
> -./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xbacf446c
> +./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xeb450e41
>  48e6caf6a59e32f9a8a39979c9183a7f *./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
>  10368000 ./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
> -./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xae2b58d4
> +./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xcc6d0df7
>  be2f7112fd193c9a909304c81e662769 *./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
>  15408000 ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
>  ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits CRC=0x04ed3828
> TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv422p
> TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv444p
> Test lavf-fits failed. Look at tests/data/fate/lavf-fits.err for details.
> make: *** [tests/Makefile:226: fate-lavf-fits] Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> 
> Are you seeing this?  Does the Internet have something to say about
> these?

No I did not see this here, all tests passed. I've tried searching
ffmpeg bug tracker and commit logs but nothing useful came up.

Is it possible to see that 'tests/data/fate/lavf-fits.err' file on
CI somehow? I don't actually expect it to be of much help though.

I also see errors on ffmpeg-3, as Dariqq mentioned, but looking at
the build history on CI it had also appeared on
<https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5382581/log/raw> which was before
the core-updates merge, so it seems unrelated.

bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

[André Batista]

Hi,

qui 05 set 2024 às 20:47:39 (1725580059), nandre@riseup.net enviou:
> 
> qui 05 set 2024 às 09:25:36 (1725539136), ludo@gnu.org enviou:
> > 
> > As it turns out, while all 3 variants built fine for i686 on a machine
> > of mine, there are test failures at ci.guix:
> > 
> > From <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5613329/details>:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > And from <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5613330/details>:
> > 
> > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> > --- ./tests/ref/lavf/fits	1970-01-01 00:00:01.000000000 +0000
> > +++ tests/data/fate/lavf-fits	2024-09-04 17:57:17.900035764 +0000
> > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> >  ed9fd697d0d782df6201f6a2db184552 *./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
> >  5328000 ./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
> > -./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xbacf446c
> > +./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xeb450e41
> >  48e6caf6a59e32f9a8a39979c9183a7f *./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
> >  10368000 ./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
> > -./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xae2b58d4
> > +./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xcc6d0df7
> >  be2f7112fd193c9a909304c81e662769 *./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
> >  15408000 ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
> >  ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits CRC=0x04ed3828
> > TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv422p
> > TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv444p
> > Test lavf-fits failed. Look at tests/data/fate/lavf-fits.err for details.
> > make: *** [tests/Makefile:226: fate-lavf-fits] Error 1
> > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > 
> > Are you seeing this?  Does the Internet have something to say about
> > these?
> 
> No I did not see this here, all tests passed. I've tried searching
> ffmpeg bug tracker and commit logs but nothing useful came up.
> 
> Is it possible to see that 'tests/data/fate/lavf-fits.err' file on
> CI somehow? I don't actually expect it to be of much help though.
> 
> I also see errors on ffmpeg-3, as Dariqq mentioned, but looking at
> the build history on CI it had also appeared on
> <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5382581/log/raw> which was before
> the core-updates merge, so it seems unrelated.
> 

Sorry, I think my previous message was a bit confusing. What I meant to
say was that ffmpeg-5 had build fine here, but ffmpeg-3 didn't and I did
hit the same error as above shown on CI.

Since then, CI has successfully built ffmpeg-5[1]. So I'm guessing its
test failure was transient, even though this latest success originated
from a commit[2] which was afterwards reverted[3].

However, ffmpeg-3 is still failing[4] with that same lavf.fits error,
even on that same commit. I've dabbed here increasing the verbosity to
debug level, but I still don't have any clue as to what is triggering
this failure.

I'll report this upstream and see if ffmpeg devs can help us out here.
Otherwise, as a last resource, we could disable that test and live with
a slightly broken ffmpeg-3.

1. <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5617581/details>

2. <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=36e30a33e8c67d15ccfae6e4a4289c193f0759ad>

3. <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=c4a2b99f7d06ef5676d4148410a3b734c286f7cb>

4. <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5617551/details>

bug#67308: bug#72917: ffmpeg-3 build failures is duplicate of bug#67308

[André Batista]

qua 11 set 2024 às 17:10:49 (1726085449), nandre@riseup.net enviou:
> 
> qui 05 set 2024 às 20:47:39 (1725580059), nandre@riseup.net enviou:
> > 
> > qui 05 set 2024 às 09:25:36 (1725539136), ludo@gnu.org enviou:
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > And from <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5613330/details>:
> > > 
> > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> > > --- ./tests/ref/lavf/fits	1970-01-01 00:00:01.000000000 +0000
> > > +++ tests/data/fate/lavf-fits	2024-09-04 17:57:17.900035764 +0000
> > > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
> > >  ed9fd697d0d782df6201f6a2db184552 *./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
> > >  5328000 ./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits
> > > -./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xbacf446c
> > > +./tests/data/lavf/graylavf.fits CRC=0xeb450e41
> > >  48e6caf6a59e32f9a8a39979c9183a7f *./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
> > >  10368000 ./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits
> > > -./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xae2b58d4
> > > +./tests/data/lavf/gray16belavf.fits CRC=0xcc6d0df7
> > >  be2f7112fd193c9a909304c81e662769 *./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
> > >  15408000 ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits
> > >  ./tests/data/lavf/gbrplavf.fits CRC=0x04ed3828
> > > TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv422p
> > > TEST    filter-pixdesc-yuv444p
> > > Test lavf-fits failed. Look at tests/data/fate/lavf-fits.err for details.
> > > make: *** [tests/Makefile:226: fate-lavf-fits] Error 1
> > > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > > 
> > 
> > I also see errors on ffmpeg-3, as Dariqq mentioned, but looking at
> > the build history on CI it had also appeared on
> > <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5382581/log/raw> which was before
> > the core-updates merge, so it seems unrelated.
> > 
> 
> [...]
> 
> However, ffmpeg-3 is still failing[4] with that same lavf.fits error,
> even on that same commit. I've dabbed here increasing the verbosity to
> debug level, but I still don't have any clue as to what is triggering
> this failure.
> 

This ffmpeg-3 error was already reported at #67308[1]. So I suggest we
discuss it there, if anyone makes any progress.

+CC 67308 for reference.

<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67308>

bug#67308: ffmpeg-3 build failures on i686

[André Batista]

I've created a trac ticket upstream:

<https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/11189>

Cheers!

bug#72917: ffmpeg@{3,4,5} build failures on i686-linux

[Dariqq]

Hi André,

On 03.09.24 16:24, André Batista wrote:

> 
> I'm sorry for that, I should've checked that this string would match on
> earlier versions of ffmpeg. Looking back, replacing the 'die' clause
> would make more sense. However, since changing it now would trigger
> many rebuilds, I'll send a patch which changes the match only for the
> broken earlier versions.
> 

Thanks, your patch looks a lot more sensible than my bruteforce way.  I 
have successfully rebuild my system with your patch applied.

What would be the best way to get it to master? QA seems to think the 
issue contains no patch.

> Thanks for reporting and feel free to CC me if/when you see that a patch
> of mine has been incomplete or otherwise has caused issues.

Have a nice day,
Dariqq