From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6EmHLbxqJGXvfAEAauVa8A:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 23:03:56 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:2d92::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6EmHLbxqJGXvfAEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 23:03:56 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BB203556F for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 23:03:56 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=Lfcwr05S; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=W3fNh1w5; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1696885436; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=/go7ALoJFzb5Jr1+Wj95w5t9EnTiBWZs6D7HiRBX31Q=; b=tEsVkf+ELIXBVw3FU2HF/EOBlFneDBKy22N4Winj/4uAL7iSCkssfY2tCrLOo3j7/B9gFa vKnqSi48sNXnkDMWJK8BQjaRQftUqz8vwB/LOCfykWj7xI66mdDuEBaZw/SbC+O1VpVdXf U26ZzFH2CKdtbsTbPQWZofjdEDp8CR2c3/a/TBGSt3O1OWMcqWbAiSRxO3+TKtANj/8b2W +FS8YnRgxNb/BxaORYE6Vu4YI3Pp2uoTifl4s2YRSxMwGCIY+qfNWIuSqCuy9WmzPKIkH4 UJ2T26BSWxHH028G30gelGgCHgnvbFMksZp/BtuoIxuM+no3HTfGgT5AjHkEyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=Lfcwr05S; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=W3fNh1w5; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1696885436; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=iCIbdR1XJm/Gh3OeNp1qG/xxvsfommf1xSv1hXrSadjdj1iqb72/gq4SwHNghY2biDzEsn 4sJU/Se0o8vcKA8WzbA01QiVajx2JQVgr7ZwaY7/H1d+inxTlBhJfedpGfVuK3K7nwhw1B I6Gy3gjIP/QeuWROAkKsdyUfPob05pDPrm6rESyEyQpr3J3XwLw3ZN1pKc+zak3aFtMJcc VoWAn21fOEX2baM96Z3v89K5vIiTVSgTfg7myrOCVX9pFj4xNZC3SXlURea4tJ1xmToEOd mWy7iQY7FHcK7AoByJvwYSKDzKPPVh/Xq6DqmrHnejHQUN+jwtkcqLHzE4w4xA== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qpxPk-0002Tj-A1; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:03:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qpxPi-0002TM-Cq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:03:42 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qpxPi-0003TG-4S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:03:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qpxQ2-000743-Hg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#65924: git searches coreutils and util-linux commands in PATH Resent-From: bokr@bokr.com Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 21:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65924 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Liliana Marie Prikler Cc: 65924@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer Received: via spool by 65924-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65924.169688542927134 (code B ref 65924); Mon, 09 Oct 2023 21:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 65924) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2023 21:03:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33494 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qpxPp-00073Z-Ho for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:03:49 -0400 Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.200.34]:46318) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qpxPk-00073G-Fe for 65924@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 17:03:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E61E3779; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 21:03:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1696885397; bh=n0wxnTiY0KYh3zo2pooCTNlA5MO/GqZkqpFGb8i6Pbo=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Lfcwr05Sk1k85ajGG0nVn9Ra94CRqmBiUg7jxTG9WOv1IslT/NcbcYT9sIqIWN4QA aKLnvZyTPudXqCnkHsQg4t5g5CSChti0mUmGEJ2AShZMIY851RZllSyvwLLCWFkGq5 REUsyv5JM23ikOPDTy3QCXSRzXiO32SuAMLpSk3q9krVLMCRuYjVkoeFG8t0zZjB6Y /4FNef8yNKvlQaYeM9HolpMrIXD6rxzkEPpCfy8V0BksLvObGycGJMdjK39Vit2VCp gAJpVGhd9NrNKR4tofJ/UEO8cs9msIUGnDVamhfe1p1aOeOhsyVpijgQTE32KJUqtf xLBy0bCXZGXbQ== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at emo08-pco.easydns.vpn Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (emo08-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XCnjPpsRsKaf; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 21:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [83.185.242.126]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63339E36AD; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 21:03:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1696885396; bh=n0wxnTiY0KYh3zo2pooCTNlA5MO/GqZkqpFGb8i6Pbo=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W3fNh1w50icmghIzgokj5HYDJ1mjs9MPTQ8pC9kLPPF2B3JTUQmoKZMF89Joo6ovH y+jv9OkV69oFEp8yMSBlFOi7jYOtTVFYSXkrDcJf7Mx1YF6LCJJOeCKdMTfrzKmIR1 5DloJniSKdRrXEe0B5KZRaqVmxj8bhqjaBOMGBio4/7Qlllp1Am8HQ4p62Ks9t1Eva GeWsd0T8t5T2i8/4YBddQx4mGYqjBSlMq8ANmkvM37UOIxVd+lpcqhJW9cEqUpXt3P Alj7TgcSfotKh8xJjLIZQyrdlwnGrzbsnrbsJgpzSn3YxlFrL1qkm4+sHZOkEoPrVq bADWvRrg00Xzw== From: bokr@bokr.com Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 23:03:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20231009210300.GA32650@LionPure> References: <9f9ecf37a04d6a3d788d247d8fb46f7bd6fabad5.1696734901.git.maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> <442bb34f6ba81b7134c6cbf06d0045debc42bf68.camel@gmail.com> <87il7fdggi.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <1a219a891192b526d3e28fea8ce350c0fd5e3b53.camel@gmail.com> <87pm1nac8d.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: bokr@bokr.com Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.54 X-Spam-Score: -1.54 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7BB203556F X-Migadu-Scanner: mx2.migadu.com X-TUID: jlMaOb+cs7Kw Hi, On +2023-10-09 20:33:38 +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Am Montag, dem 09.10.2023 um 14:21 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > > Hello, > > > > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > > > > > [...] > > > If you need me to reduce it to four letters, yes, LGTM. > > > > Explicit is better than implicit.  I've been thinking to document > > this in our contributing section; e.g. a reviewed commit must have > > the 'LGTM' from the reviewer.  If a series is LGTM, it needs to be > > implicitly mentioned with 'this series LGTM'.  That may sound silly, > > but I think it'd simplify reviewer/submitters interactions. > s/implicitly/explicitly/? > > I don't necessarily agree, but it's not a hard disagree either. I'll > try to keep that in mind at least when reviewing your patches to not > cause confusion. > > Cheers > TL;DR: Would it make sense to anticipate that LLM-bots will be used to automate gathering of info for reviewers? If so, what would a style guide for english in posts (like a coding style guide, but for LLM-bot consumption) look like? Some kind of literate programming for LLM-bot and human use? (I assume experiments have been going on by now, though perhaps not yet for guile or guix) -- Regards, Bengt Richter