Hi, Thanks a lot for working on having a recent FSDG compliant versions of phoronix-test-suite. I've found a minor issue with phoronix-test-suite and I've a couple of questions to help synchronize between Parabola and Guix to prevent accidental installation of nonfree software. Nonfree software downloaded by phoronix-test-suite: --------------------------------------------------- According to Debian, Linux has the following nonfree files: > Documentation/netlabel/draft-ietf-cipso-ipsecurity-01.txt > arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/micropatch.c > drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/af9005-script.h drivers/media/i2c/vs6624.c > drivers/net/appletalk/cops* > drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia > drivers/video/fbdev/riva The GNU project also mention that ("nonfree blobs are shipped with Linux, the kernel") in the list of distros that are not FSDG compliant[1]. When running 'phoronix-test-suite test build-linux-kernel' (and selecting Yes(Y) to install the test), phoronix-test-suite downloads a tarball of Linux. So I assume that the tarball downloaded also have nonfree software like arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/micropatch.c. So we also need to filter-out two tests (to keep being FSDG compliant): > pts/build-linux-kernel > pts/unpack-linux As I understand, the other build should be fine. Question on the package description and collaborating with Parabola: -------------------------------------------------------------------- If I run 'phoronix-test-suite list' on a fresh Guix installation, it lists nonfree software like BioShock Infinite, Hitman, which are games that have not been released under free licenses (according to Wikipedia). I've installed Guix on a separate computer just for that (as it would be negligence from my part to risk running nonfree software like that on computers that are either hold keys to sign releases or build releases). And there it seems that it runs hoses tests (I need to do that in a terminal in a graphical interface like sway for instance) but I'm unsure if it actually downloaded nonfree software or not as the tests seem to fail and I didn't find the games being downloaded (but I only looked rapidly). If it didn't download any nonfree games, we could update the package description to explain how this FSDG compliance is done to not make users afraid and prevent invalid bug reports. I also saw there is a python script[2] that somehow is supposed to take care of FSDG compliance. How does it work in practice? I'm also asking because I've also added phoronix-test-suite to Parabola long time ago with a very different patch, and if for some reasons both patches are incompatible, I don't want to end up in a situation where users running Guix on top of Parabola would end up accidentally installing nonfree software. If that's the case it would be easier to fix the issue in Parabola (just by updating phoronix-test-suite and taking care of informing the users to delete their old ~/.phoronix-test-suite/) but I also need to understand how the python script works first. Once these questions are sorted out I'll try to install Parabola instead of Guix on that test laptop, import my existing ~/.phoronix-test-suite/, install Guix on top, and install phoronix-test-suite through Guix to see if the nonfree tests somehow run something. And I'll then report the result of test here and I'll then probably end up updating in Parabola (and reusing your patch). References: ----------- [1]https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html [2]gnu/packages/patches/phoronix-test-suite-fsdg.patch Denis.